Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.147.134.218

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

IBM Introduces the Industry's Fastest One Terabyte Storage Tape Drive

     
11:52 pm on Jul 15, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member eelixduppy is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 12, 2005
posts:5966
votes: 0



IBM today introduced the industry’s fastest one terabyte (TB) storage tape drive, which will enable clients to protect and archive more information with less cost and less energy usage - the highest capacity and performance of any tape drive in the market.

The new IBM System Storage TS1130 Tape Drive will be able to store up to one TB of uncompressed data per tape cartridge and with a native data rate of 160 megabytes per second (MB/s), storage backups can be completed up to 54 percent faster than the previous generation drive.

[www-03.ibm.com...]


The new IBM System Storage TS1130 (GA) will be available worldwide on September 5, 2008 with a starting price of $39,050.

I'll take two ;)

5:06 am on July 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14483
votes: 49


That's a lotta tape. ;)

You'd think they'd be moving on from tape backup development with solid state drives and other technologies available.

3:04 pm on July 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member eelixduppy is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 12, 2005
posts:5966
votes: 0


>> solid state drives

My guess is that for what tape drives do, there isn't anything that matches it exactly or is better for what they're used for. SSDs have their disadvantages, too, and as far as I know TB storage on SSDs is only experimental? Also, from a wikipedia article, SSDS have a "higher vulnerability to certain types of effects, including abrupt power loss", which isn't something I'd like to have when archiving data. Tape drives generally have archival stability.

12:57 am on July 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:July 11, 2008
posts:8
votes: 0


$39,050? Does ANYONE need this?
1:32 pm on July 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Full Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Mar 22, 2008
posts: 315
votes: 0


$39,050? Does ANYONE need this?

Uncle Sam.
1:37 pm on July 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 8, 2004
posts:1679
votes: 0


You'd think they'd be moving on from tape backup development with solid state drives and other technologies available.

Reliability of solid drives is unclear at the moment, where as tape (unsexy as it is) has been in existance for decades so practical issues of long term storage are known. $39k for a backup drives that can store priceless bank data (for example) is peanuts.

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members