Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.162.172.144

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

AMD Introduces Multi-Core Chips

     
2:34 am on Mar 28, 2008 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14659
votes: 66


AMD comes out swinging with 2 quad chips and a triple core [computerworld.com]

Advanced Micro Devices Inc., which took a lot of heat for falling off its game last year, looks to be back in the fray with today's unveiling of three desktop processors.

AMD announced that it's releasing Phenom X49000 processors for high-end desktop systems, along with the 65-watt quad-core Phenom X4 9100e and the Phenom X3 8000 triple-core processors.

Some are saying that the AMD quad-core designs are better than Intel's. Intel supposedly puts 2 dual-core chips together to make their quad-core, while AMD's design is a 'true quad-core'.

2:54 am on Mar 28, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 8, 2004
posts:1679
votes: 0


It seems to me that AMD has got serious yield issues - triple cores are effectively quad with one broken core that is disabled. I reckon those people that thought native design will be better are having some second thoughts.
9:37 am on Mar 28, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from KZ 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lammert is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 10, 2005
posts: 2889
votes: 5


triple cores are effectively quad with one broken core that is disabled

This practice is not unheard of in the processor industry. IBM produces the Cell processor where the processors with one failing mathematical core are used in the Sony Playstation 3.

It has been a long time since AMD was able to produce chips that could compete with Intel's high-end processor line. I am not sure if releasing three new processors will get them back in the race.

12:21 pm on Mar 28, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member kaled is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 2, 2003
posts:3710
votes: 0


It seems to me that AMD has got serious yield issues - triple cores are effectively quad with one broken core that is disabled.

No chip manufacturing process has anywhere near 100% yields for CPUs, so this is just good business. Also, both Intel and AMD have released CPU packages with disabled features. It's simply a means of using a single production line to create chips to cover a wide price range.

Historically, slow versions of chips have often come from the same production run as fast versions, with testing used to sort the best from the worst. Incidentally, golf-ball manufacturers have been known to do this too.

Kaled.

5:09 pm on Mar 28, 2008 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 8, 2004
posts:1679
votes: 0


No chip manufacturing process has anywhere near 100% yields for CPUs, so this is just good business.

True, but some yields are much worse than other and this forces companies to follow track that is hardly a good business - it's so-so business, which argueably better than bad business (throwing it away completely).

When AMD first started talking about tri-cores Intel's reply was along the lines of: "we actually have good enough yields not to HAVE to do it".

A much bigger issue for AMD is that they can't clock their chips now and even at that clock they are not as efficient as Intels quad cores.

Note here - I am not Intel or AMD fan, I just use the stuff that is best value wise: I have 5 X2 AMDs, but switched now to quad cores from Intel as they simply rock.