Forum Moderators: phranque

I'm curious, what would you want to change?

recurring theme mostly ill-defined.

         

tangor

12:12 pm on Sep 22, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Elsewhere on another thread this was said:

but even posting here feels like work due to the old interface or lack of options


THIS IS NOT A POLL!
THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ANY KIND!

I'm just a member, nothing else. No part of the back end on Webmasterworld, just a curious guy. This comment, or one like it, comes around every-so-often, mostly as a complaint for something or other without real specification.

WHAT EXACTLY IS WRONG? WHAT EXACTLY IS DESIRED?

To ME, a forum is communication in the most direct UI possible. TEXT ON SCREEN. Editing tools sufficient to do the task. Members to interact with. Archives---searchable---leading to past and present knowledge/commentary. Logical layout. Moderated topics. S-p-a-m free. Reasonable ads instead of a jungle's worth. Commonsense user profiles. A DM that's quick and easy. A sensible TOS, and willingness to STICK TO IT on both sides...

When Badges were discussed some years back I was con---what purpose did they serve? Well, we got'em, and we ALSO got a method to turn'em off! (Cuts down on the scrolling!) Works for me. :)

I don't see WW the way most do. I run HIGH CONTRAST ACCESSIBILITY GRAPHICS which turns my screen into a 1980's black and white monochrome-like screen, just with very high resolution AND a boost in font size simply because I am going blind by inches. "Pretty" does not translate to users like me so I could care less, but it seems others are more interested in the "dated" appearance than the CONTENT, which puzzles me.

Do you come for the graphics, or the WORDS?

What is your wish list of mods AND why?

If not obvious... I like things just the way they are. Good content. Good management. Good folks.

explorador

3:09 pm on Oct 7, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Sure, I don't want to point the negative, but if we are talking about fixing mode, or repair mode, some things are part of the conversation.

Ok.

I see diff people talking about unwanted refreshes, this is not happening on my end. I use Firefox with uBlock Origin (Windows), never experienced a single refresh on this forum. My first line on this post points to things told on very old threads as advice: use your website on every possible browser to check for compatibility or issues.

lucy24

5:00 pm on Oct 7, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



never experienced a single refresh on this forum
When you post, does it go straight to the updated window? On my end, Firefox blocks the (single) reload and I have to give it permission.

tangor

6:46 am on Oct 8, 2025 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Umm.... Perhaps I am confused on the "refresh" under discussion. For me the sequence is:

Enter WW (site) via browser link to RECENT POSTS. Look at the topics. Pick one to read. If I reply (quick at bottom) and hit Submit, the page I am on will reload showing my new post. I THEN use the BACK (browser) to return to Recent Posts (WHICH DID NOT REFRESH), still showing "new unread" marker to continue the process.

EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE I forget to use BACK (browser) and click my bookmark to RECENT POSTS link and ALL my previously as yet unread markers are gone, but my newly posted comment is marked as unread.

You can, of course, correct that problem by hitting BACK as many times as necessary to retrieve the original landing page in browser history and go from there.

MEANWHILE, at no time have I seen WW refreshing pages without having done anything to warrant such.

SPECULATION: Do you KEEP WW cookies each time the browser closes? (See Exemptions in Settings, Privacy & Security).
This 33 message thread spans 2 pages: 33