Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

How True Is This Statement?

"Over 10% of people have client side cookies turned off."

         

HyperGeek

6:35 pm on Apr 22, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




A good portion of my code requires cookies to be turned "on".

Was this a really bad choice? Should I go back and convert to session variables instead?

HyperGeek

2:29 pm on Apr 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well you could do everything through POST variables instead - which will hide that - but its a lot more hassle.

I do that already, but remember, when returning from a process with a message (whether it's a validation error, or a success message) - unless you use a querystring that can be manipulated - there is no other way but a session or client cookie interaction to stealth this process. Reason: Forms must be submitted to post a value...and the server doesn't submit forms. ;)

When I go to the local shop, the storekeeper might recognise me. He may even remember what I usually order.

GS, you hit the nail on the head again. The truth of the matter is that personal interaction with another human being is a lot more risky than letting a webmaster temporarily store your session information. As for "tracking" cookies, again, SPYBOT kills them all along with nasties that are FAR more dangerous to your privacy than cookies.

This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: 31