Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

SiteSucker for macOS

         

keyplyr

7:02 pm on Jul 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



UA: SiteSucker for macOS/2.10.4
Protocol: HTTP/1.1
Robots.txt: Yes
Host: Various

disobeyed robots.txt where it is disallowed

not2easy

8:40 pm on Jul 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



That's a pretty old OS there... I wonder if they have a version for WIN98?

keyplyr

8:52 pm on Jul 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



SiteSucker is pretty old but I've not seen "SiteSucker for macOS" before. Since you use Apple stuff, you may have seen it previously.

lucy24

9:38 pm on Jul 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



That's a pretty old OS there.

You mean “macOS/2.10.4”? Haha, yeah, that wouldn't even be a real OS; they were called System suchandsuch up until, I think, 8.5. Or was it 7.6? In any case I suppose that's really just the robot's version number.

It would make me very, very uneasy if a robot visiting my website professed to have some knowledge of the operating system on my home computer. Fortunately I've never set eyes on 'em.

keyplyr

10:11 pm on Jul 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



...if a robot visiting my website professed to have some knowledge of the operating system on my home computer
I don't think that's what's going on, in fact I'm sure of it. It's just the name of the bot.

not2easy

10:53 pm on Jul 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I think you're right, keyplyr - and no, I've never seen it. Pretty sure it was fabricated on the spot, in the space where you see that [Name Your Robot] thing. It was meant to be a funny (there never was an OS/2. anything). Sorry.

keyplyr

11:29 pm on Jul 12, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Any User Agent can be renamed to anything. It doesn't have to be that "[Name Your Robot] thing." This includes browsers.

So many malicious bots name themselves something benign in order to not be blocked.

lucy24

12:22 am on Jul 13, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yes, and then they blow it all by barging in demanding 17 variations on /wpadmin/

keyplyr

12:26 am on Jul 13, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Well, since this the first time I've seen this UA ever, I've not seen them request /wpadmin/. In fact, I've never seen *any* stand alone UAs request /wpadmin/, it's always done from scripts that pretend to be human.

lucy24

4:47 am on Jul 13, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I don't remember the percentage now, but a fair number of /wpadmin/ and allied malign robots come in with no UA at all. One can only assume they're looking for sites that are utterly wide-open with no protections of any kind.

Incidentally I didn't mean to imply that SiteSucker, specifically, goes around requesting /wpadmin/. It was a general response to the “something benign in order to not be blocked”.

keyplyr

4:49 am on Jul 13, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Ahhhh... it's all so very clear to me now.