Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.198.185.204

Forum Moderators: Ocean10000 & incrediBILL & keyplyr

Message Too Old, No Replies

Portlane

     
1:44 am on Aug 2, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 9, 2011
posts:13064
votes: 307


General question: can Portlane be classed as Shoot to Kill? They're apparently Scandinavian-- mostly Sweden, but I've met at least one in Denmark.

So far it's an academic question because I've only met them while looking up robots, so always server or colo. Their website says nebulously "hosting and IP related services". Can an "IP related service" ever be human?
8:29 pm on Aug 2, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from GB 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member dstiles is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 14, 2008
posts:3101
votes: 3


I have 5 portlane ranges, all blocked.

46.246.0.0 - 46.246.127.255
80.67.0.0 - 80.67.31.255
178.73.192.0 - 178.73.255.255
188.126.64.0 - 188.126.127.255
193.105.134.0 - 193.105.134.255
9:58 pm on Aug 2, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tangor is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 29, 2005
posts:6734
votes: 350


Are they over the top or malicious in roboting? One can spend a lifetime blacklisting when whitelisting is easier to control.
11:04 pm on Aug 2, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member wilderness is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 11, 2001
posts:5437
votes: 2


Are they over the top or malicious in roboting? One can spend a lifetime blacklisting when whitelisting is easier to control.


If this debate is going to be introduced into each and every thread, than this forum should definitely be shut down.
When the forum topics are focused primarily upon whitelisting, there are simply not any threads introduced, and the few that are introduced are not discussed because the syntax for whitelisting is not available.

It's bad enough this forum remains moderated, and each new thread must be pre-approved, with a policy that was instituted back in 2003 or 2004 due to participants that are no longer even participating in this forum.

The simplest solution is to shut the forum down.

Don
1:32 am on Aug 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 9, 2011
posts:13064
votes: 307


For the record: I meet hardly any "pure" robots these days. ("Hi. I'm StinkyBot. spamsize dot biz sent me.") They're still trying, but they get the 403 they deserve, so I don't think about them. It's primarily botnets with humanoid UAs. I could fine-tooth-comb the UA and continue filtering out the spurious ones. But honestly, at this level of detail, with a site the size of mine, it's less trouble to go with IP blocks.

dstiles, there's also one at 5.249.161. But I blocked all of 5.249.160.0/21 (all Sweden) for the heck of it. Oh, and 5.254.128.0/19. Both of those are from recent botnet activity; I pulled the past month and did some more lockouts.

I reserve judgement on two recent ones from 137.135. Look it up :)
5:15 pm on Aug 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tangor is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 29, 2005
posts:6734
votes: 350


If this debate is going to be introduced into each and every thread, than this forum should definitely be shut down.


Yikes! Sorry... I've been away for a year, didn't realize there were touchy subjects. Trust me. I'll just lurk from here on out. I'm sure many find the forum extremely useful.
7:18 pm on Aug 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 26, 2001
posts:6156
votes: 75




I also block Portlane (an SE hosting company.)
9:46 pm on Aug 3, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from GB 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member dstiles is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 14, 2008
posts:3101
votes: 3


Lucy - thanks. According to DNS, though, this is netalia not portlane, although there may not be an ownership difference: I haven't checked. 5.254.128.0/19 is another netalia range (which I already had). 137.135 - yes. :)

My netalia range (all blocked and including Lucy's ranges above):

5.249.160.0 - 5.249.167.255
5.254.128.0 - 5.254.159.255
185.5.44.0 - 185.5.47.255
212.59.64.0 - 212.59.95.255

I'm quite prepared to believe there are more. :(
7:45 am on Aug 4, 2013 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 26, 2001
posts:6156
votes: 75


Thanks dstiles, I didn't have 5.249.160.0/21