Had a few interesting hits from a rackspace range.
twice requested a page that was very very old and 301'd to the new version.
the best part was that the UA was simply n/a
so the question is should the whole range be blocked?
lucy24
7:17 pm on May 11, 2013 (gmt 0)
Rhetorical question:
Has anyone ever had a visit from a rackspace range that was good and deserving and did not merit an instant 403?
dstiles
8:04 pm on May 11, 2013 (gmt 0)
See the sticky posting at the top of this forum for a full-ish rackspace list.
Can't say I've ever seen legit bots from their ranges.
lucy24
9:11 am on May 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
Sonnet 153.
Yes, OK, I had to look it up.
dstiles
6:52 pm on May 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
And the correspndance betwixt Old Bill and Rackspace is...? :)
lucy24
8:20 pm on May 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
Whoops! I assumed that when the moderators came by and snipped the spam post I was responding to, they would snip the response too. It was a couplet (browser history says "But found no cure, the bath for my help lies. / Where Cupid got new fire; my mistress' eyes.") followed by a clutch of links.
dstiles
9:18 pm on May 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
Ah. I assume from that there was a spam preceding your sonnet. Fair enough. :)
