Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.110.143

Forum Moderators: Ocean10000 & incrediBILL & keyplyr

Message Too Old, No Replies

bottlenose.com

     
8:13 pm on Aug 10, 2012 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 26, 2001
posts:6662
votes: 128




UA: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_4) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/20.0.1132.57 Safari/536.11
robots.txt: no

OVH dedicated servers
178.33.60.0 - 178.33.63.255
178.33.60.0/22
6:41 pm on Aug 11, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from GB 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member dstiles is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 14, 2008
posts:3125
votes: 4


I have the whole of 178.32.0.0 - 178.33.255.255 blocked as being OVH, FR - although individual sub-ranges seem to be registered in different EU countries.
6:58 pm on Aug 11, 2012 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 26, 2001
posts:6662
votes: 128


But it appears that not all of that /15 is dedicated to server farms.
7:21 pm on Aug 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from GB 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member dstiles is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 14, 2008
posts:3125
votes: 4


The range includes all sorts, from server farm to cloud. All of it is OVH so in my book it's rejectable. If it includes broadband then OVH are remiss in not segregating the /15 properly.
7:49 pm on Aug 12, 2012 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member wilderness is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 11, 2001
posts:5459
votes: 3


All of it is OVH so in my book it's rejectable.


In my book that Class A falls under same status ;)