ChinaCache

[wilderness]

69.28.58.77 - - [06/Apr/2012:15:17:32 +0100] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200 2536 "-" "nutch-1.4/Nutch-1.4"
69.28.58.77 - - [06/Apr/2012:15:17:32 +0100] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 533 "-" "nutch-1.4/Nutch-1.4"
==========
Caught and denied on the Nutch.

Previously had the 28.128-191 denied.
The Peer1 is a new range for me.

Anybody see any reason why the entire Class B couldn't be denied?

69.28.0.0 - 69.28.31.255
CIDR: 69.28.0.0/19
OrgName: ATHENET DATA EXCHANGE
69.28.32.0 - 69.28.47.255
CIDR: 69.28.32.0/20
NetName: PTERA
OrgName: Ptera Wireless Inc.

ChinaCache North America, Inc CHINACACHE-1 69.28.48.0 - 69.28.63.255

69.28.64.0 - 69.28.95.255
CIDR: 69.28.64.0/19
NetName: ICC-ATLANTIC-3
OrgName: Internet Connect Company, Inc.
69.28.96.0 - 69.28.127.255
CIDR: 69.28.96.0/19
NetName: CCDT-NET-BLK1
OrgName: Telekenex Inc
69.28.128.0 - 69.28.191.255
CIDR: 69.28.128.0/18
NetName: LLNW-1
OrgName: Limelight Networks, Inc.

Peer 1 Network Inc. PEER1-BLK-07 (NET-69-28-192-0-1) 69.28.192.0 - 69.28.255.255

[Staffa]

I have all the ranges that you mention blocked.

"ChinaCache is the leading provider of internet content and application delivery services in China"

There's no point in blocking CN if they then come crawling from US IPs ;o)

[wilderness]

I have all the ranges that you mention blocked.

Hopefully you made the adjustment as myself and jest changed to 69.28.

[Staffa]

I got you ;o)

I'm on a Win server and work with an adjusted geo-ip dbase, so for me they all are separate ranges

[dstiles]

I've had the range 69.28.48.0 - 69.28.63.255 blocked since Sep 2010, when they first began testing transmission interception for TalkTalk in the UK under the (false) claim that it would improve virus protection.

You should also look at blocking them on 65.255.32.0 - 65.255.47.255.

I recently came across the China-based version at 106.48.0.0 - 106.49.255.255 which I also block.

[keyplyr]

Thanks dstiles

[wilderness]

ditto ;)