Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.145.173.147

Forum Moderators: Ocean10000 & incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

deprecated browser - humor

   
4:08 pm on Mar 31, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member wilderness is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



120.40.148.zzz - - [31/Mar/2012:16:58:01 +0100] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 533 "http://www.example.com/ (requested URI)" "Mozilla/1.22 (compatible; MSIE 2.0d; Windows NT)"
8:08 pm on Mar 31, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's a very large country with some very remote places where they may not yet have heard that there have been updates for that browser ;o)
8:49 pm on Mar 31, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member dstiles is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member



Looks like a mobile of some sort to me, but yes, old.

Bear in mind that a lot of CN browsers are not official and so are never included in MS updates, which is why they are so prone to exploits.
10:14 pm on Mar 31, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time Top Contributors Of The Month



Mozilla how many did they say? :)

I once met a Netscape. Think I even posted about it somewhere. Where old browsers go to die. In the same way that retired big-city transit buses get sold to progressively smaller towns before ending up in Mexico, retired browsers end up as Chinese robots.

:: vague mental association with Black Beauty ::
4:58 am on Apr 1, 2012 (gmt 0)



[evolt.org...]
has all the old browsers back to the original WWW.
Unfortunately, it looks like it is dead, some kind of SQL error.
:(
6:33 am on Apr 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member wilderness is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Unfortunately, it looks like it is dead


Try this [wayback.archive.org]
6:47 am on Apr 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time Top Contributors Of The Month



... and that's why you should always have a webmaster@ address, forwarding to "real" e-mail of your choice.

It's also-- skipping forward to the next post-- why some people weigh the pros and cons and end up deciding that, yeah, better let Wayback do its thing.
7:12 am on Apr 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member keyplyr is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



some people weigh the pros and cons and end up deciding that, yeah, better let Wayback do its thing.

<rant>
I do not see any pros with the Internet Archive. Not only do I see it as blatant copyright infringement for illicit gain, it (and all cached copies of sites) is a huge security hole that bypasses browser-side & server-side defenses against hacking/scraping/clipping/etc. In addition, adds do not display so it's a loose/loose situation for the webmaster.
</rant>
2:07 pm on Apr 1, 2012 (gmt 0)



[browsers.evolt.org...] is still alive. I tried to write them to let them know their main page is down, but as pointed out the contact page is also down. Anyway, I used to keep my home pages working in Mosaic 0.6 (probably, still does) and occasionally browse the web in old browsers -- sorta like driving a model T or something. It didn't understand table tags correctly, so there are lots of weird br tags in my source to get around this, also it was before nbsp could be used, so you had to use #160.
2:23 pm on Apr 1, 2012 (gmt 0)



I did a dns lookup and e-mailed evolt.org to let them know, hopefully, the address works.
11:51 pm on Apr 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time Top Contributors Of The Month



Me too :) so when john@ whatever-it-was next checks his e-mail, there will be a flood.

:: crossing fingers and hoping it isn't one of those "last seen in February 2009" webmasters ::