Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Extreme brazenness

         

lucy24

11:17 pm on Oct 22, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



In the most recent logs I found a series of hits to a roboted-out directory by something calling itself Extreme Picture Finder. Well, OK, let's be fair: it didn't know it wasn't allowed in there, because it didn't read robots.txt. Maybe it doesn't think of itself as a robot.

Normally we wouldn't post links, but I think the application's own page describes them better than I ever could:

[exisoftware.com...]

Who wouldn't want to add a tool whose features include
Download images, music, video or any other types of files from websites automatically
Find pictures with built-in web picture search engine
Up to 30 simultaneous connections - you'll have your files very fast
Download from TGP and password-protected sites


What to do, what to do...

BrowserMatch "Extreme Picture Finder" keep_out

keyplyr

11:33 pm on Oct 22, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



So the UA is "Extreme Picture Finder" ? (always helpful for me when the entire UA string is posted so I can code accordingly.)

Looks like earlier version UAs were "Internet Picture Finder." And when "Extreme Picture Finder" is bundled with "Internet Search Tools" it does not display a UA entry of its own at all.

lucy24

2:00 am on Oct 23, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yup, "Extreme Picture Finder" is the exact UA from beginning to end.

The IP was

99.95.nnn.nnn

but I kinda assumed blocking by UA would be more effective. It's splat in the middle of an innocuous ATT range. It might even be a human user's IP; don't know how that works.

Looks like earlier version UAs were "Internet Picture Finder." And when "Extreme Picture Finder" is bundled with "Internet Search Tools" it does not display a UA entry of its own at all.

Further pawing through raw logs suggests that the very word "Internet" occurring anywhere in the UA string is grounds for blocking. I find:

from someone blocked by IP so long ago that I can't even remember why I blocked them *
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Rogers Hi-Speed Internet; SV1; Alcohol Search; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

and (here, the "MSIE <6" ** would have got them blocked anyway)
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Cox High Speed Internet Customer; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

and similarly
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Cox High Speed Internet Customer; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Media Center PC 3.1)

Further afield:

Internet Explorer

Really. In full. And ### and ### it all, I overlooked them thanks to forged referer that got them auto-ignored in log wrangling. That last one lives at ... well, ### again. It's bluecoat, using a fractionally different IP than the exact address they've always used with me in the past. But what are they doing, snooping around images with a forged IP? That's not their normal behavior at all.


* Looked them up. It's websense. Blocked eons ago on the "I don't like your face" principle. Using forged UAs is not calculated to make them any handsomer.

** MSIE 6 can only come in if they arrive via a search engine. Some people really do have very old computers.