Forum Moderators: open
UA looks like this:
FollowSite Bot ( [followsite.com...] )
Any info on these folks?
From the conversation of the thread, I would be cautious of using.
[edited by: incrediBILL at 10:34 pm (utc) on June 6, 2009]
[edit reason] Removed URL, no links to external threads please [/edit]
One one version the setting for IE to constantly reccheck saved pages and bookmarks for updated pages, was the default setting.
Thus is MSIE will do this (and the majority of the WWW uses IE), why go the trouble of inserting text into your active pages for another website to service its customers (unless they are giving you a commission on their fees?)
Falls under "3rd party category" for denial. IMO.
The FollowSite site itself has barely any info. I'm blocking it.
[edited by: incrediBILL at 10:35 pm (utc) on June 6, 2009]
[edit reason] Removed URL, no links to external threads please [/edit]
[edited by: Pfui at 11:20 pm (utc) on Feb. 13, 2009]
77-...-...-130.static.servage.net
FollowSite.com ( http://www.followsite.com/b.html )
robots.txt? NO
FWIW, I hate a love-hate thing going on when it comes to talking about site-specific (as opposed to the Big 3) bots here because it just means PR for the bot-runners. Like these guys' UA strings and info page -- nothing but spam. Ugh.
[edited by: incrediBILL at 10:35 pm (utc) on June 6, 2009]
[edit reason] unlinked URL [/edit]
netid.com
FollowSite Bot ( [followsite.com...] )
77-232-77-nnn.static.servage.net
FollowSite.com ( [followsite.com...] )
77-232-66-nnn.static.servage.net
Servage Robot ( [servage.net...] )
With the exception of e-mail address harvesters, your guess is as good as mine what any bot/runner does with e-addresses. But just blocking a few or even bunches o' bots won't necessarily solve spam- or rank-related issues. For those, your solutions probably lie elsewhere. (Like w/ content; links; etc.)
Also from that range is not only that bot. I can see in my logs various RFI attempts.