Forum Moderators: open
[edited by: Receptional_Andy at 7:19 pm (utc) on Nov. 6, 2008]
The IP is Google, but it's triggered by their visitors using the tool.
I wonder if there are some bots out there using this tool.Does not seem like human behavior that is hitting our site, It does definately look like bot behavior though.
Were it my sites that were repeatedly visitet, crawled, etc., whatever!
By the IP range you provided and under the UA of Adwords or which you or your sites are not participating in?
I'd simply deny the range to the Class C. Perhaps higher if the bot returned under another range.
I've portions of Google denied access to my sites and these denials do not affect the continuious crawling from the standard Google bots (i. e., 66.249.xx.zzz)
In addition I've the 209. 84 & 85 Class B's denied as well as the 72.14. Class B.
In addition I've the Google Image bot denied (Aug 2006) over robots.txt excluded crawlings that were supposedly (they did cease for a short while) intervened and corrected manually (the bot returned again within a short period and after the intervention correction).
In the end, we each make our own choices. As you'll be required to do.
Not the logical explantion of Google's reason for grabbing your pages, at least that you were hoping for.
Don
Note, though, that as per the thread above, the tool requests 10 URLs in one second if someone chooses the spidering option for keywords. So it doesn't take much human activity to reach 2000 hits.
If you think people are scraping the tool, you could always contact Google. They obviously don't want bots using it, hence the captcha.
Because the UA is consistent, it's easy enough to block, anyhow.
In addition I've the 209. 84 & 85 Class B's denied as well as the 72.14. Class B.
My apologies to everybody.
This [webmasterworld.com] should have read:
In addition I've the 66.249. 84 & 85 Class C's denied as well as the 72.14. Class B.
Don