Forum Moderators: open
LOG:
c-69-138-198-xyz.hsd1.md.comcast.net - - [01/Jul/2006:18:34:49 -0700]
"GET /dir1/file1.html HTTP/1.0" 403 803 "http://www.example.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=1234&forum=567"
"Hadrinka Tumaj Al-Kahal WebWasher 3.4"
c-69-138-198-xyz.hsd1.md.comcast.net - - [01/Jul/2006:18:34:49 -0700]
"GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.0" 403 803 "http://www.example.com/dir1/file1.html"
"Hadrinka Tumaj Al-Kahal WebWasher 3.4"
c-69-138-198-xyz.hsd1.md.comcast.net - - [01/Jul/2006:18:35:30 -0700]
"GET /dir1/file1.html HTTP/1.0" 403 803 "-"
"Hadrinka Tumaj Al-Kahal WebWasher 3.4"
NOTES:
No robots.txt, per usual with WebWasher, a bad egg for ages and ages.
This is the first time I've seen Middle Eastern descriptors in its name, tho'. Could be 'personalized' or someone goofed up or is saying -- something?
(Yet another .comcast.net troublemaker.)
217.20.113.110 "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 95) WebWasher 3.3"
194.115.171.70 Proxy Server -> (1.0 DESYP019, 1.1 webwasher (Webwasher 5.2.0.1858))
206.169.110.66 "virus_detector virus_harvester@securecomputing.com" via Proxy Server *1.1 webwasher (Webwasher 5.3.0.2198))
89.51.12.27 gdddzdserwrtsetsetge WebWasher 3.3
71.192.26.130 Opera/8.52 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) WebWasher 3.4
The UA doesn't appear to be a bot, it's a security filtering technology:
[cyberguard.com...]
Did a real good job too as it filtered itself right off my website.
Great translation, D.G.!
Jim
"Had Drinka Too Much Alcohol" -- Very clever. Thanks again!
Best,
Paige Turner [ethanwiner.com]
: )
I for one try not to block web filters -- I don't want them to ban *me* and lose the opportunity to market to surfers behind corporate proxies/caches/filters at work.
There's a big difference between a web filter and a proxy server that replaces the UA.
If they can't pass the UA properly so that I can give the visitor a page that will render properly, I'd rather block them than leave a bad taste in their mouth with a page that doesn't know how to adapt to the quirks of a particular browser.
FWIW, I don't see more than a handful of requests from such web filtering proxies, and if enough users of these proxies complain they will FIX them and we'll never know the UA of the proxy or it will be in the PROXY VIA field instead of the USER AGENT field like it's supposed to be.
I don't bend over backwards for buggy software, not my problem.
Besides, they probably filter out my cookies and don't credit me for sales either, blah.
Just my $0.02