Forum Moderators: open
87.237.113.z - - [22/Feb/2007:09:57:37 -0800] "GET /MyFolder/MyPage.html HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
65.83.25.zzz - - [22/Feb/2007:09:57:39 -0800] "GET /SameFolder/SamePage.html HTTP/1.1" 200 27767 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
The refers were blank (as provided) so I'm unable to determine if a search was ontopic.
The page itself is a frequently visited page and frequently ontopic search result.
The RU request was 403'd and no images were requested.
The US request was accompanied by all page images.
BTW is two seconds a short time ;)
The page can be difficult to find unless the search is highly customized (I do get some occassional widget interests from Russia and I have opened an extensive folder via whitelisting recently that offers links to many of my pages NOT located in that extensive folder. This formerly closed folder excluded nearly all NON-North American IP ranges.)
A google on "Ben White", possibly a common name doesn't provide much. I stopped flipping through pages after 20 without seeing my page listed.
IF, however I add ("Ben White" +specific term)than my page (s) come up at the top of listings.
Utilizing "other" terms, my page (s) come up very close to top.
The entire point is that this page is not exactly easy to find, at least randomly.
The entire point is that this page is not exactly easy to find, at least randomly.
I've removed the lines for image requests, which only accompanied the requests from the IP 70.156.68.zzz
(I've left the favicon request in tact)
Note; two entirely different IP ranges from MS utililzed.
An additional range from Sprint and a 4th from an MCI sub-net.
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:55:53 -0800] "GET /MyFolder/MyPage.html HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
70.56.168.zzz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:55:59 -0800] "GET /SameFolder/SamePage.html HTTP/1.1" 200 80184 "Sort of on Topic Google" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:00 -0800] "GET /SameFolder/ HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:05 -0800] "GET /MyFolder HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:11 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:12 -0800] "GET /SameFolder/SamePage.html HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
204.249.11.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:15 -0800] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
207.46.134.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:15 -0800] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3"
207.46.134.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:16 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3"
70.56.168.zzz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:16 -0800] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1" 200 318 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:17 -0800] "GET /SameFolder/ HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
204.249.11.19 - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:22 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
204.249.11.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:22 -0800] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:23 -0800] "GET /SameFolder HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
204.249.11.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:29 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:29 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:30 -0800] "GET /SameFolder/SamePage.html HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
204.249.11.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:30 -0800] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:35 -0800] "GET /SameFolder/ HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
204.249.11.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:37 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:41 -0800] "GET /SameFolder HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
63.80.56.zz - - [28/Feb/2007:07:56:47 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 - "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT; ....../1.0 )"
More often what I see is a valid browser UA spiders a page and if nothing goes wrong a SE UA gets the same page. None of them reads robots.txt. Sometimes the first UA will fall into a trap. The second UA avoids it and avoids getting banned. I can't ban the first UA cause it's usually for a major browser.
69.168.51.118 - - [27/Aug/2006:17:05:22 +0200] "GET /blog/blahblah.html HTTP/1.1" 200 7325 "http://example.com/" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
67.175.103.235 - - [27/Aug/2006:17:05:23 +0200] "POST /blog/blahblah.html#comments HTTP/1.1" 200 7555 "http://example.com/blog/blahblah.html" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)"
Since I fixed things so that whatever's posted from this kind of "session" lands in data nirvana, this sort of activity seems to have dropped off.
(Note to self: must get life, over the last few years I have developed the ability to spot non-human website activity just by watching logs...)
is it possible SE checking same checking same page at same time from different locations around the world to see if the website owner showing different content to them or fooling SE
i know its perfectly legal to show up different content , which is more relevant to user according to location