Forum Moderators: open
REFERER: [www...] .robtex.com/host/www .yoursitehere.com.html
(boo-hiss)
(I added a blank after each www .)
.
FYI from a Domain Tools domain-t-o-o-l-s-dot-com/robtex.com (handy for peeking:) --
"Multi RBL check and AS numbercheck"
(I don't know what that means but results from a Google check make the site look suspect.)
[edited by: volatilegx at 3:46 am (utc) on July 23, 2006]
[edit reason]
[1][edit reason] fixed some broken stuff [/edit] [/edit][/1]
The link provided by "System" --
[webmasterworld.com...]
-- that's intentionally unbroken so you can scroll along and see any errors of its way(s) because that routes to --
[webmasterworld.com...]
-- but it results in a pithy, unstyled:
Some times a 404 is just a 404...1:dv4
Go home... [webmasterworld.com]
-- even though there's a boatload of code therein.
Curiouser and curiouser!
Perhaps it's time to officially move this thread to the bit bucket and start anew?
: )
[edited by: Pfui at 9:04 am (utc) on July 23, 2006]
Heck, I didn't even include another handful of new sightings. Even the ubiquitous McCOLO is even more so, hiding --
psycheclone
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum11/3269.htm
(see also P.P.S., below)
208.66.195.10 - - [11/Jul/2006:07:56:14 -0700] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.1" 403 815 "-" "psycheclone"
-- a.k.a. --
208.66.195.5
208.66.195.6
208.66.195.9
208.66.195.4
-- behind --
208.66.195.10 - - [20/Jul/2006:09:03:32 -0700] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.1" 403 815 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"
-- still a.k.a. (and still 403-worthy in my book) --
208.66.195.8
208.66.195.3
208.66.195.11
208.66.195.7
-- and still hitting up to eight times a day.
(I need to get a free-standing firewall box that's Mac-programmable. I'd really love to place rules against hoards of robotic vermin.)
.
P.S./FWIW
McColo Corporation MCCOLO (NET-208-66-192-0-1)
208.66.192.0 - 208.66.195.255
Digital Infinity Ltd DIGITALINFINITY (NET-208-66-195-0-1)
208.66.195.0 - 208.66.195.15
.
P.P.S.
The psycheclone/McColo thread, lasted posted-to on June 30th, is already closed. I wish threads in this forum stayed open longer so we could simply append new observations over time rather than going through the post/hold/approve/post process all over again for the same subjects. (hint,hint?:[smilestopper])
Aw, shoot. Another belated tpyo-catch shows up as:
[1][[b]edited by[/b]: Pfui at 12:27 am (utc) on July 24, 2006][/1]