Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Windows NT 5.2?

I wasn't aware of this type of browser...

         

kewlbeezer

7:23 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I was looking through our site logs just now... discovered this:

Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.2;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322)

It came from 131.107.65.225.

Any info?

jdMorgan

7:36 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



kewlbeezer,

Welcome to WebmasterWorld [webmasterworld.com]!

I believe that's Internet explorer 6.0, Windows XP operating system.

Jim

kewlbeezer

7:38 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Adding a couple of things... here's the server logs from the two visits I have had so far...

2003-04-06 03:06:53 131.107.65.225 - 192.168.20.11 80 GET /site/newsletter.aspx - 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.2;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322)

2003-04-07 12:06:24 131.107.65.225 - 192.168.20.11 80 GET /products/plus_literature.aspx - 200 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.2;+.NET+CLR+1.1.4322)

Its important to note that it ONLY requested the page, not any graphics that were on that page...

I'm highly suspicious of this visitor...

kewlbeezer

7:40 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Jim...

XP is always recognized as Windows NT 5.1 I thought...

I have been tracking this stuff for a long time and I've Never seen NT 5.2

jdMorgan

7:54 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



kewlbeezer,

Yeah, I just found that thread again... 5.0 is Win2K and 5.1 is WinXP. So you've got yourself a fake ua there...

Jim

sullen

7:59 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No, it's not a fake. In fact it was probably me.

Win NT 5.2 is the new .NET server (currently available as a releace candidate for we OS saddos to test for nothing)

Win XP is NT 5.1 or 5.11

kewlbeezer

8:02 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Jim... yeah... I'm thinking that too.

Imagine this: an ARIN search on this IP returns:
OrgName: Microsoft Corp
OrgID: MSFT
Address: One Microsoft Way
City: Redmond
StateProv: WA
PostalCode: 98052
Country: US

sullen

8:02 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



that would be "release candidate"

the fact that this person only got the page and not the graphics could simply be due to a rubbish connection (again, could have been me!). Or can you still turn graphics off in IE 6?

kewlbeezer

8:03 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Sullen...

Explain more if you could... Thanks!

Scott

sullen

8:07 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Um, just that NT 5.2 (or .NET Server) is the successor to Windows 2000. It's released in April, but some users have test copies alreadyand have done for nearly a year.

If you're interested, it's a pretty good OS - XP without all the graphic sparkly bits.

Like I say, there are genuine explanations for a user getting just the page and not the graphics. The Microsoft address looks a bit odd, but, well, I wouldn't get too paranoid yet.

sullen

8:09 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



should read - the successor to Win 2000 Server. Don't know what's the matter with me today.

kewlbeezer

8:12 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Okay, sounds good. Thanks :) I was just curious what it was since I haven't heard about it yet :)

Scott

jdMorgan

8:14 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



OK, So another MS product to add to the list...

Windows NT 5.0 = Win2K
Windows NT 5.1x = XP
Windows NT 5.2 = Win.Net server

Thanks for the info, sullen.

Jim

WitchLars

9:33 pm on Apr 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



> It came from 131.107.65.225.

That appears to be a bot coming from Microsoft. See this thread: [webmasterworld.com ]

-Lars

RonPK

5:11 pm on Apr 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Thanks Sullen, this answers my question in [webmasterworld.com ] ;-)