Let say a page has 60 Link value and it has 6 internal page links. Then each page will get 10 link value.
60/6 = 10
And if this has just 2 internal links then each page will get 30 link value.
60/2 = 30 (*More link juice = Greater chance to rank higher)
No your math is wrong. The issue is that you cannot look and the propagation of link-juice by looking at a single step. Link-juice flows, one must look at all the links on all the pages in an iterative process.
Example:
- One external link feeds 10 link juice(LJ) to the Home-Page.
- The home page has two links one to page 1 the other to page 2.
- Page 1 gets 5 LJ, page 2 gets 5 LJ (so far this coincides with your calculation)
- Page 1 has one link to Page 2, thus Page 2 gets an additional 5LJ, now Page 1 has 5LJ and page 2 has 10LJ
- Page 2 has one link to Page 1, thus Page 1 gets an additional 5LJ
- Finally the Home page 10LJ, Page 1 has 10LJ and page 2 has 10LJ (assumes page 1 and 2 each have a link to the home page)
(note: this example is over-simplified, because there is a circular reference at play, but assuming every page links to every other page then this holds)
Now lets take page 2 out of the equation:
- One external link feeds 10 link juice(LJ) to the Home-Page.
- The home page has one link one to page 1, page 2 to is orphaned
- Page 1 gets 10 LJ
- Finally the Home page 10LJ, Page 1 has 10LJ and page 2 has 0LJ
The net result is that page 1 didn't gain any link juice by removing page 2.
Simply put links from every page to every other page will distribute the LJ evenly throughout the site. Removing or for that matter adding a page will not have any impact on the total LJ.
However, adding an additional links to a specific pages that one would like to draw attention to will have an impact. It will be a far more effective means of ensuring that those page will get more "LJ" as these links will make the difference.
If you really insist on preventing link juice from flowing to a certain pages you can use javascript instead of a link. But then you will run into issues of users that have js disabled.I certainly wouldn't use no-follow for the reason described by Lucy24.
nofollow is supposed to be “I can’t vouch for this link so please don’t place the weight of my reputation behind it”