Forum Moderators: open
"To download Adobe Acrobat please click here [adobe.com]."
The site don't use click here word in its content or in Meta's.
SandySEO - Metas don't have much to do with search engine ranking.
The title element is still probably the most important onpage optimizing element (when used in conjunction with other content on the page), but it's not a 'meta" element.
Meta descriptions can be important for marketing purposes, but they don't help your rankings. Meta keywords have been so misused that the search engines essentially ignore them.
Anchor text in inbound links, though, can be a powerful ranking element, and had been used in various "Google bombing" exploits, as they were called, to cause semantically unrelated pages to rank because of 'mischievous' links directed at them.
Until very recently, eg, inbound links containing the phrase "miserable failure" would cause the GW Bush bio on the White House site to rank as #1. Google has made algorithmic changes, and this no longer happens.
Because of this change, it's not quite clear why "click here," does still bring up the Adobe site.
To see the effect of Google bombing, check out the miserable failure search on Yahoo. [search.yahoo.com]
adobe has a unique position because of the ubiquity of the pdf format.
there is probably no other document type used so widely that requires a plugin.
it also happens to be the most common phrase to describe the most common action that occurs in a web browser.
there are billions of links with "click here" anchor text.
Thanks in Advance!
SandySEO
This is my 2nd post in WebmasterWorld.
Th fact that adobe.com ranks no 1 for "click here" is a pretty good example of the important of back links and anchor texts towards a site's ranking in the SERP.
And also the fact that Pres Bush's page is no longer available for "miserable failure" is because google has dropped it's bomb on Googlebombing.
In adobe's scenario the linking is legitimate but that of Bush's was not. So it's not there anymore.