Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Marketing a New Site - What are the top priorities?

Reciprocal Linking VS SEO

         

rintrah

1:23 pm on May 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



When promoting a site from stage zero for Google, what's better to focus on for faster initial results: reciprocal linking or optimized pages?

Not expecting to be in the top 5, but this site has NO visibility, and I'd like to get at least a visible ranking fairly quickly.

AnneG

1:27 pm on May 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think you need to do both. Results from optimization don't happen in days, but months. Meanwhile, getting same-themed reciprocal links can help both with optimization and referrals.

If you want instant results you may need to see if PPC is worth your while.

Robert Charlton

7:44 am on May 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



rintrah - Anne's advice is good. You need to do both. Think of inbound links as references. When the search engines look at your site because of these references, the site needs to deliver the content that supports the references.

If there are no links/references to your site, the engines won't take your site very seriously... In fact, they may not even index it.

Depending on what phrases you're competing for, you may or may not need a lot of inbound links to rank well. Ultimately, for the long run, you will need both.

deejay

8:43 am on May 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



As above, you do need both... but I don't see a conflict in doing both. I think they have a natural order.

SEO should be part of your focus from the time you start to design the site. Ok, you'll do brushing up, refining, etc, over time... but getting an idea of your keywords and building them into your copy is done before the page even goes up, designing your page structure, formatting your headings to use H# tags..... why would you put up a site and then come back to do these things later? Cut out the double work and you'll double your time.

A properly SEO'd page is actually quite resilient and doesn't need a lot of ongoing attention, whereas linking should definitely be an ongoing strategy - both checking your existing links and gaining new ones.

It's not difficult to get a link or two, which is all it takes for the SEs to find you.. and then you can build the links from there. But the links won't have the value you expect if your pages aren't SEO'd for the appropriate terms.

The other thing, of course, is that a well-SEO'd site will invite links when prospective partners are searching for "widgets add url" and your site comes up tops.

Long and short of it:

1 SEO in design and page building stages of site.

2 Linking strategy on launch of site and ongoing.

Remember, too, that links are significant to Google, but of secondary importance to the other SEs.

Robert Charlton

11:36 pm on May 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



A PS to the above... I won't submit a site to a directory that hasn't been optimized. Editors tend to include in a description what they see on a site.

Similarly, I think that a site that's been designed with good basic SEO principles has a better chance of getting relevant links.

rintrah

1:12 pm on May 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Wow thank you all for the sage advice

seoRank

11:30 am on May 31, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Site optimization (read building keyword relevance) and Link building (read PR improvement) have a mutiplier effect on ranking.

An oversimplification would be to say -

Keyword relevance factor X PageRank = ranking

If relevance for keywords is zero and PR is 10, ranking will be zero.

Vice versa, if keyword relevance is 10 and PR is zero, ranking will be zero.

Both need to go hand in hand for overall performance.