Forum Moderators: coopster

Message Too Old, No Replies

can you suggest a 300 hours site

         

aspotism

3:25 am on Apr 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hey.
Thanks in advance to all.

I`m wondering if you good folks could post some sites that are php and xml based that required 300 to 400 hours of work to complete.

I`m just trying to figure out the scope of an upcoming project. I was told it will be 300-400 hours of work and I`m curious to see what a site like that looks like.

Thanks!

Habtom

4:30 am on Apr 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



300 hours work on site A != 300 hours work on site B

300 hrs work of Programmer A != 300 hrs work of Programmer B

aspotism

12:58 pm on Apr 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Huh?

coopster

1:08 pm on Apr 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member



Welcome to WebmasterWorld, aspotism.

I believe what Habtom is expressing is that the amount of work that can be accomplished in an hour is going to vary so widely amongst tasks and programmers that any specifics you get are going to be so broad it wouldn't be of much use.

Outside of that, we don't allow url drops [webmasterworld.com] in the forum so anybody that responds to your request ...

if you good folks could post some sites that are php and xml based that required 300 to 400 hours of work to complete

... we would likely remove the links anyway.

deMorte

1:21 pm on Apr 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think what Habtom means that the time to build a site depends on many variables. It is hard to compare a site to another, at least only by seeing the end-product.
One developer can spend hours on end making a neat layout and graphics on an otherwise very basic site, while other developer uses the same amount of time on a complicated system that looks like crap.

aspotism

2:15 pm on Apr 17, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ok, thanks anyway.