Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

         

Aaron

7:24 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



anyone else notice? or is this old news?

bobriggs

7:46 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes, a site I submitted near the end of May has gone from buried to page one..

rcjordan

8:06 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Sung to the tune of an old sea-ditty:

Man! I love AV and AV loves me!
'Cause I have slots two, seven, and three!
Do-da! Do-da!
Oh, I love AV and AV loves me...

This time. Remember 'Black Monday' RC?

(edited by: rcjordan on 8:35 pm (gmt) on June 22, 2001

angiolo

8:08 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It seems the same dance, but ranckings is slowly increasing.

All the pages of a site seems to gain ranking.

The combinations of the keywords work fine.

If you were ranking fine for a three words phrase, now you can rank fine for any combination of that keywords.

engine

8:33 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yep, major change - indented results too.

SERPS are pleasing.

rcjordan

9:15 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



SERPs are rotating.

toolman

9:27 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It looks to me like they went back to what it was 3 weeks ago.

Alecto

10:06 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)



toolman.. I think you're right.

A couple of weeks ago AV was giving us 5% of our referrals. Then, for two glorious weeks they sent us 10%. Now they've gone, like the Swamp Thing, back to where they came from, carrying our referrals with them.

I'm just about ready to go...

engine

10:19 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It's not the same as a few weeks back - the serps are different.
New data is showing up.

I have a test search I've used for three years to check the serps. It's the same format I've always used. The results are showing different data to three weeks ago. Before you say it, these are NOT new pages. The new data was already in the db, it's just that they are now showing up on P1.

rcjordan

10:48 pm on Jun 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I just went through the T30 on the phrase I use. Relevancy is good, very good. There are only a few domains with multiple pages and these are very popular pages in terms of traffic. At first, I thought it was spammy... upon a closer look at relevancy and what I know the visitor is looking for on this SERP, I'm beginning to think that AV may have intentionally allowed a few popular 2nd pages in on purpose. If so, this could be a big hit with JohnQ.

pmac

12:10 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



A most definate update. A completely buried site just surfaced in the t-20. Still see some odd listings that are out of touch with the kw, but a big improvement.

msgraph

1:49 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The might have added an extra new batch to the rotating results. I'm still getting an older set (1-3+ weeks ago), in addition to a newer one from a few days ago.

It's still following the same route as what I posted here on what results it's displaying, rotating I mean and not phrase matching and "free stuff" searching:

[webmasterworld.com...]

rcjordan

1:54 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>newer one from a few days ago
>
June 9th is the most recent date I've seen so far.

msgraph

2:14 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>newer one from a few days ago
>
June 9th is the most recent date I've seen so far.

Ooops, sorry, I should have stated newer refresh. :)

Weird thing I noticed a little over a week ago was that I had a few brand new sites listed on June 6 that were placed on the second page. Just for a few days only to be dropped back down into the abyss again.

I wonder if they are throwing new stuff near the top for a short time to see if it pulls in any hits, if not then they get dropped back down. Or, what seems more like AV-style, display some different results for a few days then change everything back to normal.

I'm still pondering why they dropped the phrase matching words on the "number of Web pages that contain your search terms" line. Now they just show all the words separately instead of also showing the pages that contain the phrase in addition to the separate words.

rcjordan

2:26 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>what seems more like AV-style,
>
Uh-oh! I knew the pattern looked familiar. It looks just like the boost AV did before they dumped all their titles & descriptions and went to the Looksmart versions. I can't imagine that we're going to go through that again, but the 'Last modified' dates aren't correct, I'm sure of that. And that was the first thing that caught our attention before.

msgraph

2:53 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Again I'm spending another Friday night pondering AV! ;)

This is really getting strange.

I have one site listed 2 and 3, 3rd being indented that is on the 9 out of 10 refreshed rotating results.(if you know AV then you know what i'm referring to.)

On the oddball rotated results I'm at number 9 and 10. Now the second page(indented one) is a totally different page on my site than the indented page on the first set of rotated results.

I've seen this on a few other sites I have listed.

Sound confusing? Well the term Altavista means confusing in the lost language of the DEC tribe.

Soooo, little tip here, if you really look into how and why they show those indented results, you can kill two birds with one stone in the results if you play your cards right.

rcjordan

2:58 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



ms, what browser are you using? I'm guessing that it's not IE on a pc. Netscape?

msgraph

3:04 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



IE 5.5 on pc. Thought about loading up the v. 6 but I think i'll wait.

Not sure if it's related, but when I said refreshed I meant re-clicking the search button under the same search term and not the refresh browser button.

rcjordan

3:10 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Alright, this is getting AV-ish. I'm on IE5.5/pc but my SERP does not show slot #3 as an indent. If I run the same search on NS4, the SERP is identical, but #3 is indented.

Too bad AV doesn't turn the traffic anymore, it would make this a whole lot more interesting. We're pretty much just doing this out of habit now, eh?

startup

3:33 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have indented listings for the same site on many SERPs for different KW searches.
In my case it is the result of multiple Looksmart listings.

msgraph

3:59 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>We're pretty much just doing this out of habit now, eh?

I think so! My overall traffic has dropped 50% because of AV's mishaps these past 4 weeks. I've been working like crazy trying to get it back but I'm really wondering if it's worth the effort. I've been seeing some results turn up where the top 30 sites are all sub-domains riding with the same doorway template. I've reported this numerous times to their spam reporting address but they won't do anything about it. Not even a reply.

They are really starting to show the signs of serious money troubles IMHO. It's like they have an anything goes attitude to what they allow in their results because they lack the man power and cash to fix it.

engine

8:11 am on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Did you notice this?
Click on a link to leave av (don't open a new window). Press the back browser button to return to your av serps. What do you see? [ last page visited ] pops up next to the title.

Aaron

1:37 pm on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So only the order of ranking has changed? Anyone got any NEW pages in the index?

awoyo

1:59 pm on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It works for me. That's the *first* time I ever had a #1 spot on AV.

:) :) :)

lharpf

3:57 pm on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)



>> June 9th is the most recent date I've seen so far.

I'll top that: June 13th.

It's good to see AV update, but I'm not really happy with the results at the moment. I don't know whether I should start submitting my fine-tuned pages or just forget the whole thing and focus on something else. As rcjordan said, AV is no longer what it used to be.

Jill

4:42 pm on Jun 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



We got wiped on this one. I checked this about 4 days ago and it's the same as it was then. Many of our long standing domains have been nuked for no apparent reason. Some of them had been in the index for over 5 years with little fluctuation. We haven't been getting a lot of traffic off of AV even with top ten listings recently so I just about wrote them off my list anyway. I am hoping they are fooling with things and we get put back in or I'll have some letters to write come Monday... yeehaw!

makemetop

6:36 pm on Jun 24, 2001 (gmt 0)



Is this the shuffle before paid inclusion? I see that Pandia [pandia.com] are hinting at Wednesday 27th as being roll-out day.

Anyone any other news/information?

Napoleon

7:26 pm on Jun 24, 2001 (gmt 0)



Interesting... for me the index is better than it has been for many many months. Relevancy is very good and everything is reasonably up to date. Much cleaner - and about time too. Reminds me of when AV was the engine for others to follow.

I do have severe doubts about their paid spider scheme though, and the Pandia article sort of hits the nail even though they are actually referring to Ink.

The problem lies with the fact that returns are polluted with Goto... the top 3 are 'featured sites'. The dilemma is in paying for something when for popular terms the best you can hope for is #4. And who is to say they won't make it the top 5 or 8 or whatever in the future (can anyone trust AV on their past habit of grabbing cash at the expense of their core product)?

This significantly devalues their scheme. Many people will see that they are trying to have their cake and eat it all at the same time.

If they dump Goto their scheme has a good chance of working as the index will hopefully restore the faith of those who have lost it. If they keep Goto (or at least keep the results at the top of the page) they will be fighting the battle with an arrow through their heart.

dogboy

4:48 pm on Jun 25, 2001 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ok, I think AV just flipped back to the 'new' results again. Mackin confirmed this too, but NFFC is still seeing the old ones....