Forum Moderators: open
The results are terrible! Mirror sites, extreme cases of keyword stuffing, crude hidden text everywhere... reminds me of what the spam filters were targeting about 2 years ago.
This surely can't be the new AV? It's like seeing an old friend who has just been mugged.
Results
#1: Webmaster FAQ at the W3c.
Right on target - highly relevant. Only problem is every search engine on the net has them rated #1. 'suppose that was just an accident? lol
#2: Email the NY school of Webmaster.
Not appropriate for this keyword. Emailing the webmaster isn't something that should be found in the top 1000 results, let alone at #2.
#3: South-Western College Publishing Webmaster
Lets email the webmaster at South Western college. again...more email.
#4: Comment to Net Images' Webmaster
More email to the webmaster.
#5: WebMaster Incorporated at webmaster.com
Well, hey, now we are talking. We'll give them a few points for this one.
status: 2 for 5.
#6. Webmaster E-mail - McGraw-Hill Ryerson
There is that email again.
#7. Webmaster Services at clemson u.
That is a tough call. Pass. We gave them #5, we have to have this one back.
3 for 7.
#8. Phil Malone's Online Resume. Internet Software consultant: Annapolis, Maryland.
Phil needs a hair cut and a job! What's with the Tatoo? #8 under webmaster - that is a nice bit of promotion Phil and we hope you find gainful employment soon. Sorry, we can't give points for your resume for these purposes, even though we admit The Phil Cam [mr-phil.com] is a nice touch rarely seen on a Resume page ;-)
3 for 8.
#9. Russian Webmaster Agency.
Ok, we'll give you some points here. Don't know why, but it is on topic.
4 for 9
#10. Bravenet.com Webmaster Resources Website Tools
We are in the money now.
5 for 10.
#11. CSM Webmaster
*sigh* email again.
5 for 11.
#12. Webmaster World
Highly relevant and recommend. (should give them 2 for this one, we would if it were in the top ten ;-)
6 for 12.
----
When I did the same test last summer it was 9 of 10. 90% vs 50%.
