Forum Moderators: open
Thanks
Ink doesn't make the paid vs. non paid clear to the average user.
I think if it was public knowlege that AOL's search results were skewed my money (but that fact wasn't disclosed), they would no longer be a trusted resource.
-s-
Thanks
HUH??? I was under the impression that AOL identified paid and unpaid results by way of "Sponsored Links" shown at the top of the page, followed by "Matching Sites" which are Inktomi, Pure Search results. Have I been labouring under a misconception Steve?
Please clarify!
>>Ink doesn't make the paid vs. non paid clear to the average user.
If I'm reading it right, stcrim is saying you can't tell which of the Ink listings at AOL are paid or unpaid. Paid are included or updated within days, but it sounds like Personalniche is trying to find out how long it takes to get new pages included or existing ones updated if they're not paid for.
Personalniche, it was mentioned in another thread that the unpaid get included at some regular interval if they "meet the criteria." No specifics were given, but it's probably safe to assume that having some links from sites already iin the database is a good part of the criteria.
There's also been reference to Ink using ODP and Looksmart titles and descriptions, and since those are human-reviewed I'd assume that those links are considered to have credibility. I wouldn't hold my breath through a Hotbot or MSN submission unless there are some good inbound links, especially from one of the directories.