Forum Moderators: open
probably best to use for new pages that you want to rank quickly only and not worrying about renewing even if they are only needed short term.
Without going into precise details, it appeared 2 sites were (maybe)reported by a competitor and were (absolutely) inspected by a human (in logs). They would have previously been acceptable under the (somewhat lax) Inktomi guidelines - but didn't pass this time. Put up 2 new sites which should pass a human inspection muster and all terms are riding high again.
I had to completely scrap the original 2 sites though, changing pages to match the rules didn't lift the penalty - though no doubt I could have gone through the whole thing of e-mailing Ink., etc. It was quicker to pull the sites from Ink and submit new ones.
On the pages, an enterprising client took it upon themselves to add some really obvious spam to a few of their pages in the last week or 10 days. An auto-penalty zapped them within a matter of days - before I had even noticed what had happened.
So, it appears that there are some more stringent auto-penalties and some aggresive follow-up on reporting to catch the more obvious doorways, js redirects etc., etc.
My frank feeling is it has something to do with the experiment which are going on at MSN with their site preview [help.msn.com] which will instantly show up all spammy doorways, could reveal cloaking and expose multiple SERP stuffing.
If you can get to see it it could be a Google beater - but they do need to clean up their index for it to be really effective. (IMHO).
The MSN preview may also have something to do with Overture being tougher on having words going to pages that have something to do with the term and not liking pure affiliate link sites. If this all happens at MSN (and elsewhere) no-one is going to click on their sponsored listings as the surfer can see the site before going to it - if it doesn't look 'good' they won't click on it - no matter how much is bid :)
Different ball-game is about to start - and forewarned is fore-armed ;)
From what I've seen it's not really the domain thats penalized...it's the keywords.
If you scroll down while the page is loading, which a lot of searchers do to catch the serps, the page automatically pops back up to the top target (sponsored sites) on full load.
It is subtle manipulation, but it is manipulation, it forces your window and your eye back to the paid advertisements.
Icky MS logic at work...slimeball stuff.
Imagine how much they would make if they frustrated you into submission (pun intended) to start paying in their PPC program just to be included in the top 100.
john316- I noticed that js thing a while back....it's a control freak thing - what else do you expect from M$? EXTREMELY IRRITATING.
The whole reason for the submission was aimed at the current #1 listing. It has no links that I can find, not listed in Google and no major directory listing.
My site is tailored to the phrase and it has links on pages listed in Ink. This should be a easy target, let's see what happens.
[inktomi.com...]
Suspend (or swap if you can) the URL in your paid inclusion control panel and add Slurp to your disallow list in robots.txt.
If you can't see it (and I've come to believe this is some sort of strange thing that no-one else can see - apart from me for some bizarre reason) - then sticky mail me with a search term and I'll e-mail you back the SERP I see.
You can tell I'm not spoofing - the images will come from MSNs' DB of pages that they have.
Thanks
Being on the outer fringe can be dangerous (but exciting) yet when the circle is pulled in you can be left dangerously on outside.
IMHO finding that area where you can put your head up for at least a couple of months without getting you head blown off, is not such a bad idea.
I often wonder if there was a "grand plan" to all this including the price hike to $25 a page. A lot of people bought a lot of $12 pages before that increase only to find that just a month later the whole game had changed. I was one of them. If I knew then what I know now I wouldn't have been suckered in.
(edited by: nell at 3:23 pm (utc) on Mar. 5, 2002)