Forum Moderators: open
I just got an email saying it's time to renew my listings at such and such a price. Wow, pay to renew something that I paid for and I'm not getting right now... hmmmm. Have to laugh.
The ease of contacting someone who was able to help was outstanding, especially when compared to AskJeeves and Google.
Sid
Makes Google look positively lax :)
Q: I need to buy my way to the top of the rankings quickly. How do I do that?
A: None of Inktomi's paid inclusion products have anything to do with ranking. They simply provide inclusion; ranking occurs as it would if the pages were not paid.
...then I realised it was a spoof.
There's only 3 pages on the internet that inktomi will index. Wonder if they will make it on $75 budget next year.
-s-
Can someone tell me is the algo vastly different than google (like over a 100 positions)? I know which engine I prefer to do well in !
Maybe for ink the answer is to revert to the methods that seem to do well
Well, maybe it was! That page isn't there any more. It has been replaced with [inktomi.com...]
We manage over a hundred sites in Inktomi - all different customers, different products etc. All clean optmisations, well on the 'safe side' of SEO.
Almost every single one has jumped a few places recently.
We haven't changed the pages, so clearly there is a major drop out or a tweak to the algo or filters.
Not complaining though:)
You've got to be kidding - LOL!
Well, if Inktomi is banning folks it will be one move in a long series of burning the folks who keep them alive. The SEOs are what are powering inktomi's business model. If Inktomi bans sites that paid for inclusion then it is breaking a moral contract. This has been imktomi's historic pattern. It is no surprise.
[edited by: Brett_Tabke at 9:19 am (utc) on June 3, 2002]