Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

What is the proper word count for an Inktomi Page

How many words should there be on a page Optomized for Inktomi?

         

ebgreen

3:38 am on Jan 30, 2002 (gmt 0)



How many words should there be on a page Optomized for Inktomi?

Marcia

4:09 am on Jan 30, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



ebgreen, some will say 250, which is probably right. But shorter can work. I like short pages personally - but that's just me, especially if I can't think of anything to say or have a writing block. I never count words or density, though I probably should.

Inktomi likes high density, it almost feels like "too much" repetition doing an Ink page.

ebgreen

4:15 am on Jan 30, 2002 (gmt 0)



I was debating the 250-300 word count on the spider forums and I was told that the people from Planet Ocean and other Guru's like that were FLAT WRONG. I don't want to take anything away from WebMasterWorld, but I would like some of the big guns to join in the discussion. One of ther more well know people on this other board is being belligerant.

Marcia

6:35 am on Jan 30, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



ebgreen, I know exactly who you're referring to. In his case what some refer to as belligerent I see as having strong opinions and a forthright manner of communicating them. :)

It's not that those big cheeses are necessarily wrong, but to say that a page *must* be limited to 250-300 pages can not be accurate in all cases. The big cheeses do not have a monopoly on truth, accuracy or expertise. So if any say that, yes they are flat wrong - in some cases, as in the case you're referring to. That particular gentleman you're referring to has an enormous, long and well-established, highly popular site and his pages are very, very long - much more than 250 words. I once had an exchange with him over page size in Alta Vista. He's got tremendous link popularity and he certainly does know a lot about optimization. His perspective, though, is not the same as someone with a newer site that's rather small. Those take a different approach and for the most part Inktomi has to be paid to get them in at all.

There is no_way I believe that any search engines penalize for larger pages. Maybe they won't index past a certain point, and yes in soe cases favor appears to be shown to smaller pages. Understandably so, especially in Google's case. That is not the same as someone just not ranking well, which depends on a lot of factors. For one thing, with larger pages it's harder to figure out and distribute the density.

In your place, if it's what you feel comfortable with, I'd listen to the general concensus of big cheeses. If your site has more than that number of words, break the content down and make more pages. If you don't want to, then do some more work on optimizing the larger pages. Or try an additional page or two to see the difference.

>some of the big guns to join in the discussion

The problem is that some big guns don't join online communities and post, they call it consulting and charge; it's their business. Other big guns post right here for no charge, but if it's not here on the board, you'll have to pay them for consulting, because it's their business also. We never know who may be replying to us, that's what nicknames are for. We've got some members here who I won't mention by name that I'd listen to in a flat second over any high profile people, no matter how much they've been publicized or how well known they are.

You've got to study for yourself, evaluate all the opinions you get, and get into action and try it. There's nothing like experience as a teacher.

ebgreen

1:09 pm on Jan 30, 2002 (gmt 0)



Thanks.

stcrim

9:49 pm on Jan 30, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Ink does like pages that are wordy when going for several kws or kps - but INK seems to place little value on that which reside between the body tags.

From time to time we will make a very wordy page when we want to get 50 to 100 key words or combo phrases in and only want to pay for one page...

You can say in the body: I really like blue frogs - have the same for your title and description - caugh up the bucks for the page and you are in like flint. If the kws/kps are competitive you may have to repeat the phrase a time or two and add a touch of alt text but that's it.

I'm sure INK would deny this but - it looks like its a matter of who uses the keywords the most times in the right places. They even state on their site how important the meta tags are.

INK is more about what your visa card will hold then what your word count is.

It appears INK wants it to be very easy - so you will renew next year. (although I wonder if they doubled the price because only half the people renewed this year?)

-s-

ebgreen

9:57 pm on Jan 30, 2002 (gmt 0)



Important, high-quality sites receive a higher PageRank. What makes an Important, high-quality sites receive a higher PageRank. It follows the philosophy of you can't have credit, until you get credit theme. What they are saying makes no sense. What makes a page high-quality. Is it a name, like EBAY or does GOOGLE want to see a site with a 1,000 pages all interlinked. Again, what are high quality sites?

stcrim

12:46 am on Jan 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If you are talking about INK - I think they consider anything that's paid a high quality site. At least I get that impression from looking at their search results.

If you are talking about Google they look at many factors to arrive at their search results (and none of they involve your credit card). Google is my search engine of choice when I actually want to find something on the internet because their searches usually result in quality returns.

It appears that INK is now using DMOZ listings (somehow) to improve the appearance of their search results. (just guessing on that)

In a nutshell you can feed INK old web position gold, blue line pages from years ago stuffed with keywords and as long as they are paid, you will do very well. In fact I wish I could find a two or three year old copy of WPG just so I didn't have to build the pages myself.

Sorry, I guess I have to say I don't know what they are talking about when they use the term High-Quality...

They want it to be easy to rank so you will pay up again next year!

-s-

crash

3:23 am on Jan 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Excellent post Marcia,

Thanks for hopefully clearing up a misunderstanding :)

~evil big cheese

markd

8:35 am on Jan 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Going slightly off topic, I for one hope that we NEVER see some of the more ego-centric 'experts' making contributions to this forum as I observe on others.

As someone who has so much to learn, I am constantly impressed not only by the level of expertise displayed by the learned contributors here, but also the way it is offered in a measured and professional manner (IMHO Marcia is just one example) - even when the thread gets heated.

I now exercise my right of choice by not even visiting a particular forum which was useful a year or so ago, but now has been monopolised by an individual bent on self-promotion and the sound of his own postings.

Long live Webmasterworld!

ebgreen

11:34 am on Jan 31, 2002 (gmt 0)



WMW is the best forum I've visited.

stcrim

1:59 pm on Jan 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Continuing with the "off topic" run - Brett has the best show in town and it has become that way throught his direction and careful selection of admins and mods.

But, the other half of the picture is - - the quality of the visitors we have here and the quality of their posts.

-s-

ebgreen

4:52 pm on Jan 31, 2002 (gmt 0)



I've visited other forums with less than satisfactory moderators who allow their guest's to abuse other members of the forums. Brett's staff in my opinion, does the best job.

Brett_Tabke

3:10 pm on Feb 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Ok thanks, lets stick to the topics at hand before stcrim has to pull rank (fee fi fo fum...) ;-)

>How many words should there be on a page Optomized for Inktomi?

From what I've seen with clients paid inclusion pages, 250 is too many. You can hit your density in one paragraph and call it good.

stcrim

2:39 am on Feb 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What Brett said - and in some cases we just use one sentence because it's all that's needed. Remember INK want's your pages to do well - so you will renew them.

-s-