Forum Moderators: mack
i want to build a website for a furniture company. the products will be often updated so i can't really build a new html page for every product. i suppose i should build a database from where all the data will be passed directly to the webpage, and of course update the database for every new product.
the relative software i am familiar with is html and access. could using access be the solution? is asp the appropriate tool?
which do you think is the most suitable and at the same time easier way to go about it?
any suggestions will be highly appreciated!
It saves on all the problems of database-driven websites (mySQL I think only allows 256 connections on the windows versions - SQLServer is expensive to licence) and means you can get very cheap hosting on a Linux machine with no extras installed - rather than running PHP, ASP, JSP or the like that will cost you in performance terms and in money.
<edit>I just noticed your post count - welcome to WebmasterWorld!
</edit
yes, the products will have to be updated in real time, and i think i figured out how to do that as well.
actually in which case would you prefer to use asp or php? are there any important advantages/features i might need in the future?
thanks again!
PHP has great features over ASP specially:
-Database API
-string manipulation
-Reg Expression
-more stability
-larger data moemory
mySQL:
-mych faster than access
-Full Text search
-Larger tables
-Larger records
They are well integrated
Linux server are cheaper on the net and more secure and better for e-commerce
ASP has as good a set of feature as PHP (including regular expressions, bilalak - but lets not get into a Linux v Windows discussion).
The big advantage of ASP is if you have VB/Access programming skills and/or VB Access already on your PC.
Most of the cost of developing a website is the number of hours work involved - you can buy an awful lot of hosting for the months involved in becoming proficient in a new programming language/environment. But if you have PHP already then Linux hosting is much better in terms of price/performance.
build the pages as static HTML from a database (access is perfect as a database - I use VB to build the pages but you can even do that in Access modules) and then upload using FTP.
It saves on all the problems of database-driven websites (mySQL I think only allows 256 connections on the windows versions
Is that true. I never here about your solution being used to build databases. Although I don't hear much in the way of builing them. Can you tell me why you prefer this method?
I think not and you can try it for around 1,00,000 record with around 2 KB for each record and try to run a global query.
mySQL is far better than Access but not as friendly as Access of course specially for beginners. Though, much more reliable on the web, much more secure, much much faster.