Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.197.75.83

Forum Moderators: bill

Message Too Old, No Replies

New free malware tool: Microsoft Security Essentials

     
2:03 am on Sep 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14962
votes: 125


Microsoft's New Tool in the Fight Against Malware Free to Consumers [microsoft.com]

Microsoft Security Essentials, Microsoft Corp.'s new no-cost, core anti-malware service that helps protect consumers against viruses, spyware and other malicious software, will be available tomorrow, Tuesday, Sept. 29. Microsoft Security Essentials, independently certified by West Coast Labs, is backed by the company's global security response team and is built on the same award-winning core security technology found in the company's security solutions for businesses. It requires no registration, trials or renewals and will be available for download directly from Microsoft at [microsoft.com...]

This doesn't appear to be available yet, but it's already Tuesday where I am.

I've read very good reports from the beta testing community about this package. It is supposed to be quite easy on system resources, and it isn't as in-your-face with warnings and notifications compared to packages from other vendors.

update (-bt)
The tool is widely available now and winning rave reviews:
[arstechnica.com...]

Microsoft Security Essentials has one of the simplest and clearest GUIs we've seen for an antimalware solution. This is not something we would call "obtrusive" or "bloated" like many of the security products currently on the market. It may not be the most elegant design, but that's not what one should be looking for in a security solution anyway. An antimalware solution needs to clearly communicate important information when you're using it; barring a need for user response, it should make itself scarce.

[edited by: Brett_Tabke at 12:30 pm (utc) on Sep. 30, 2009]
[edit reason] Updated Links [/edit]

11:23 am on Sept 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:23940
votes: 477


According to Microsoft, the beta is currently available only to customers in the United States, Israel (English only), People's Republic of China (Simplified Chinese only) and Brazil (Brazilian Portuguese only).
3:00 pm on Sept 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 26, 2003
posts:1284
votes: 0


Its available now for Download. URL has been updated, one linked above works.
4:49 pm on Sept 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 30, 2006
posts:1669
votes: 10


i used the beta and it worked GREAT!
5:14 pm on Sept 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4403
votes: 5


It seems fine
But check your own settings (something? might be changed)

My own setting calls for Wins FireWall off;
however that "guy" turned it back on without letting me know of the change.
No conflict to report.

<edit>Typo</edit>

5:43 pm on Sept 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:July 13, 2008
posts:1145
votes: 0


If you are using Norton Anti-Virus would it be ok to have this also? For those of you who are using this, do you have another form of virus protection also?

Because when you try to download it, it says that if you have other virus protetion, the Microsoft product may get in the way. So I am not sure what to do.

6:20 pm on Sept 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4403
votes: 5


Well, in most cases dual AV will trigger some sort of conflict.
For test purpose you might be able to right click by the right hand side of your task bar your AV icon and disable it.
Be aware that if you reboot your previous AV will resurface.
6:23 pm on Sept 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4403
votes: 5


I noticed: Heavy communication traffic.
"I.T" (not E.T) calls home!

if you go to settings, MS SpyNet you will find what's happening, although we do not know how much info is sent out, that I do not like too much.

7:43 pm on Sept 29, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from CA 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bakedjake is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 8, 2003
posts:3878
votes: 57


I've been using it for a while now on Windows 7 (since OneCare will not work on Win7) and I love it.

That said, I was a paying subscriber of OneCare and I liked it very much as well.

It is very good on system resources.

12:39 am on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 26, 2003
posts:1284
votes: 0


Seems to be running better than avast did on Windows 7. And no, i would never touch Norton Anti-virus :) Can't believe you would even insinuate such a comparison hehe

Performance wise it feels like NOD32

1:10 am on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from FR 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member leosghost is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Feb 15, 2004
posts:6717
votes: 230


NOD32 is the lightest to run ..and probably the best on any windows ( it's what the MS people tend to run themselves on their own machines desk and laptops ) ..

Anything that comes pre installed on any machine has cost the assembler no more than $2.oo or $3.oo to add in ..and so you get what you only just paid for ..:) norton or panda et al are usually pre installed ...Dis them ..buy NOD32 ..and be carefull anyway ..nothing is 100% proof.

1:21 am on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14962
votes: 125


What's Microsoft Security Essentials lacking that the others have?
1:31 am on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 26, 2003
posts:1284
votes: 0


What's Microsoft Security Essentials lacking that the others have?

Nag Windows
Horribe Installers
Popup Loading Screens
Registration Codes
Serial #s

:)

7:12 am on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14962
votes: 125


Let's stay on topic here and save the reviews of other AV products for their own threads please.
12:35 pm on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38070
votes: 16


(edit: nuked a few offtopic msgs here. Like Bill said, if you want to talk AV - start a new thread - which is a good topic - just not in the middle of another discussion)

So far, I am quite impressed by this product by MS. It installed clean and was fairly system friendly. Nice work MS. I am surprised it took them this long to get one out the door.

2:25 pm on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from FR 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member leosghost is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Feb 15, 2004
posts:6717
votes: 230


Has anyone actually installed this ( on a "disposable machine" ..that can be formatted without tears ) and run some "bad code" by it to see what it performs like ?

Or sent it to some of the more well known "driveby" sites or open a lot of spam ?

IMO thats about the only way it can be field tested for performance ( what it catches .or doesnt ? ) other than what impact it has on machine resources .

I would volunteer :) ( but the only machine I have here that meets the spec and is allowed to connect to "outside" is running XP pro sp3 .. is my wifes .and it's in use til ( I would "hear" if I touched it before ..especially in the interests of "science" ) next monday .

4:09 pm on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 26, 2003
posts:1284
votes: 0


It does work.. spent a few mins on piratebay and grabbed stuff flagged and known dangerous and it caught them all.. even the javascript stuff was quarantined
4:57 pm on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4403
votes: 5


I installed it on my dedicated "Surf & Mail" machine.

While searching I had a message stating something like
"Too many re-directs detected" and then the browser was stopped in its action.
But not sure if this is coming from G Chrome or from MS AV?

5:10 pm on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from FR 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member leosghost is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Feb 15, 2004
posts:6717
votes: 230


@ H ..it's only meant to "play nice" with IE or FF according to the specs on it's site ..

So one would assume that with chrome all bets are off and that your machine was "a poil dans les ronces" ( unclothed in the briar patch ) ..you might want to run a full scan of that machine with MSE and another known real AV ( see my post above ) ..and with chrome switched off ..before you do anything else ..with that machine ..;)

slightly OT> Actually I'm surprised to see that MS lets it play nice with FF ..Mr B getting soft in his old age ..or just trying to shut out G ( any browser ) by branding them as an "unsafe browser" on MS products ..:)

9:34 pm on Sept 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4403
votes: 5


@ Leo
No big deal, Chrome did not let open anything.
so it's a G Chrome good move

But if as you did state MS is browser picky
then everyone ought to be aware of the limitations.
But again why would it be browser selective?

12:58 am on Oct 2, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 23, 2002
posts:659
votes: 0


Let me get this straight.

Is MSE designed as a competitor to Avast and AVG?

PS. People actually still use Norton? Egads!

4:53 am on Oct 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator robert_charlton is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 11, 2000
posts:11764
votes: 270


Is MSE designed as a competitor to Avast and AVG?

Just to bump this up... is this an all purpose security suite? And does it work with all non-MS email clients, browsers, etc? I assume the answers are yes, but one never knows.

6:03 am on Oct 30, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14962
votes: 125


It protects against viruses, spyware, rootkits, and trojans. The security suite products I'm familiar with include firewall products. MSE doen't have that, but it is pretty comprehensive for everything else.

I've used it on machines with other browsers than IE, and it has nailed everything.

I'm not sure about the mail clients though. I don't use any 3rd party e-mail clients. Even if it doesn't proxy email for mail clients other than Outlook & Live, it still has both "on demand" and "on access" scanners. That should catch bad attachments.

4:52 am on Oct 31, 2009 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator robert_charlton is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 11, 2000
posts:11764
votes: 270


The security suite products I'm familiar with include firewall products. MSE doesn't have that, but it is pretty comprehensive for everything else.

Curious omission, unless MS considers that Windows Firewall provides sufficient protection. Does it?

I'd always assumed that the Windows XP Firewall was a temporary firewall that was useful to get you up and running, but ultimately needed to be replaced. I also know that my little Linksys Cable/DSL router (basically NAT) isn't considered to be all that secure by itself, so I think I'd need a software firewall.

Thoughts?

11:33 am on Oct 31, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member henry0 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 19, 2003
posts: 4403
votes: 5


Your question opens pretty much a new thread
"How good is MS FW?" Sub quest:"Is it a tmp FW?"
I will be very interested in knowing that answer
I presently run a mail and search dedicated machine that only uses MSE and MS FW.
anytime I run a MSE check and then a SpyBot Search&Destroy
I come clean, and after a few weeks I am happy to state that I gather less thrash with this setting than I did by using PCC (PC Cillin AV)
Well, after second thoughts it also could be that the combo performs less thoroughly :)
1:20 am on Nov 2, 2009 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14962
votes: 125


The Windows Firewall changed a lot from XP to Vista. The problem with the XP version was that it only worked one way. It didn't inspect outbound traffic, so the bad guys could easily phone home. The Vista version fixed that and added some more features like configurable profiles and rules.

I haven't run any software firewall, other than the Windows Firewall, for years. I've never had an issue. However, I do run a hardware firewall on my network and that makes a difference.