Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: bill

Message Too Old, No Replies

Microsoft In Open Source Deal

6:08 pm on Dec 20, 2007 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
votes: 669

The deal signed in the United States by the non-profit Protocol Freedom Information Foundation was focused on helping Samba, a non-profit maker of free, open source server software.

"The agreement allows us to keep Samba up to date with recent changes in Microsoft Windows, and also helps other Free Software projects that need to interoperate with Windows", said Andrew Tridgell, creator of Samba.

Microsoft In Open Source Deal [reuters.com]

3:12 pm on Dec 21, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from MY 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member vincevincevince is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 1, 2003
votes: 0

Despite paying 10,000 euros, samba are not permitted to share any of the information obtained. Sounds like they got the raw end of the deal, yet again. From the EU ruling, it clearly should have been provided without charge, and provided to any software manufacturer, commercial, non-commercial, open source or closed source.
11:27 pm on Dec 21, 2007 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

joined:June 2, 2003
votes: 0

The above article quoted by engine and found at [reuters.com...] reads:

"As Samba is not commercial and could not be forced out of the marketplace it was still standing and able to benefit from the ruling."

The key sentence is "As Samba is not commercial..."


Samba becomes commercial when distributed by companies such as Hewlett-Packard, RedHat, IBM, etc.

HP released a product in 2000 called CIFS/9000 based on Samba.

No wonder Gary Campbell from HP wrote a memo in June 2002 titled "Microsoft Patent Cross License - Open Source Software Impact", see [linux.com...] .

HP and Microsoft agreed on a new patent cross license in 2002. However, Campbell wrote "major products are explicitly called out as not protected by the cross license, such as Samba, Wine, KDE, Gnome, Apache, Sendmail, and Linux."

Campbell also wrote: "Microsoft could attack Open Source Software for patent infringements against OEMs, Linux distributors, and least likely open source developers. They are specifically upset about Samba, Apache and Sendmail. We believe Samba is first..."

Again, things change when open source software goes commercial and people begin to make money (profits) out of other people's patents, protocols and intellectual property.

12:53 am on Dec 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from CA 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member encyclo is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 31, 2003
votes: 6

MS has agreed to share information with the Samba project, commercial or not - so this makes any comments dating from five years ago irrelevant.

It's good news for interoperability, even if this is on a limited scale. However, the downside is that it helps bolster proprietary protocols over open equivalents. MS gains that advantage at least, which is why it has never seriously threatened Samba in the past.

6:49 am on Dec 22, 2007 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

joined:June 2, 2003
votes: 0

It's quite interesting to notice how different are the opinions of the people involved in both sides of the agreement.

Hence, it's important to have a direct link to the agreement: