Forum Moderators: open
Give me the rundown, folks. I want to know if this thing is worth the trouble of backing up all my stuff and then reinstalling all of it.
Thanks! :)
If you've got a home network Windows 7 is great to link everything together. Things just simply work. Add everything to your HomeGroup and share what you like. It's a far cry from those days of trying to get Windows XP & 2000 machines to recognize one another. It's super smooth and has easy to use with wizards to walk you through it.
As XP was more secure than 2000, and Vista was more secure than XP, Windows 7 has gone a long way to make security work right out of the box. It's a lot less intrusive than Vista (UAC), which should appease some. I think they've struck a nice balance here. It's secure, but no longer nagging in the way that Vista was.
The UI is very clean and easy to work with. I was initially not a fan of Vista's UI, but as I came to understand the reason for some of the design elements it became clear that they made some very smart choices at Microsoft. Windows 7 takes the Vista UI and improves on it.
I want to know if this thing is worth the trouble of backing up all my stuff and then reinstalling all of it.
Your question is a hard one to answer actually. If you have a well functioning system setup on another version of Windows then it may not be worth your time to go through everything to get a new OS. Maybe you should just wait until you get a new machine. However, if you have a minimal amount of software to add and setup then I'd say you might want to consider it. It has certainly breathed new life into several of my machines.
im sure most of you purchased your laptops from the likes of Dell and HP. well what dell and HP do is not let the video card makers release driver upgrades for your video cards...why i have no idea.
so if you've got an old laptop that dell or HP only provide windows XP drivers for you better head over to whoever made your video card and make sure you can grab some drivers. Some Older laptops are going to be SOOL unless W7 has a built in driver for it.
w2k can do everything Windows 7 can on low resource
Except install Adobe CS3+
That was a Win2K killer for me - needed a couple of CS3 features and couldn't run it with Win2K. There are other cases too. It's not just DirectX 11 and WMP.
Bill, the main complaint I have with Vista is the default file system navigation is cumbersome to me. Is Windows 7 better?
Sort of an academic question - wife will have a Win7 machine within a month I guess. I can decide then whether or not to be jealous.
My general feeling, though, is "never upgrade the OS on an existing machine beyond patches and fixes". Could be wrong in this case, but it just seems to be more trouble than it's worth.
Beware the failed install perpetual reboot that hit a bunch of upgraders.
Bill, the main complaint I have with Vista is the default file system navigation is cumbersome to me. Is Windows 7 better?
My general feeling, though, is "never upgrade the OS on an existing machine beyond patches and fixes".
w2k can do everything Windows 7 can on low resources
no it can't
All good news. I find that Copernic or Google Desktop Search for finding stuff and Launchy for launching stuff is much more intelligent than what I get from Vista's start button.
Pet peeve lately - Start button -> type app name -> finds the shortcut -> hit return and it launches.... Windows Explorer opened to the folder in which the shortcut appears. Seriously, what usability expert in their wildest dreams thought that's what I want to happen?