Forum Moderators: open
If I copy and paste from UE to UE I will not have any trouble
If I copy a chunk of text from IE7 to Word it works also
But if from word I try again to copy the same text and pasting it in UE, most of the time it will only paste what was previously copied from the web using IE7
It has to be tied to a cache problem because if I reboot then it works.
But on another hand if I clear my TIFs without rebooting it does not do the trick.
Any idea on how avoiding this?
Example: Yesterday I copied from one of my sites a chunk of text to MS word, checked its spelling, copied it and pasted back in IE.. no way I was only served with the web text and not the newer that was correctly copied and pasted!
And not only I may replicate the problem but it always occurs with the described copy/paste pattern!
I do not have any errors or "misfires"
<edit>
MS word to MS word = OK
MS to editor and reverse process = OK
Web to MW word or editor = OK
THEN:
MS word back to editor = refuse to paste from word and serves the previous copied from the web!
</edit>
If you may not duplicate my problem then it is a local problem and I guess tied to B-tooth
Try:
1) copy a text from a web page
2) paste it in words
3) edit a few stuffs
4) copy it from words
5) paste it in UE
if you are able to paste what has just been copied instead of serving again the very first web copy
Then it really is local - but which kind of “evil” set up does trigger it?
Maybe Word is pasting in a Dynamic HTML/Javascript or some other, that it then doesn't display.. that is maybe a Word object, rather than text. Changing the text you see maybe doesn't affect the object?
Proof of that would be paste into Notepad, which can only accept text.. copy from Notepad, paste into Word, and copy from Word to UE.
#5642 User Error: Replace user and press any key to continue :)
Incidentally you could probably use [edit][paste special] to paste unformatted text, or?possibly set a macro to paste like that.
If it is one site you're looking at then right-click and view the source to better determine where the text is, and how it might be updated directly.
I'd suggest the best way forward is to not use M$..
Disclaimer: everything obvious in this post is covered by patents pending.. duh