Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.67.166

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

Xhtml

Isn't 4.01Strict good enough?

     

gstick

11:57 am on May 23, 2011 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



I validate with 4.01Strict. I am making some additions and changes now. Do I understand correctly that XHTML 1.0 is likely to better suite mobile devices? Is 1.0 Transitional good enough?

g1smd

12:06 pm on May 23, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



XHTML is an evolutionary dead end. I use HTML 4.01 Transitional or Strict for everything.

Must start looking at HTML 5 though.

rocknbil

5:17 pm on May 24, 2011 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rocknbil is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



It's not really a mater of "good" or "bad", I look at it more as "right tool for the job." If you're outputting HTML, use an HTML doctype. If your document requires features of XHTML - extending the DDT, etc. - use XHTML. So the answer for most of us is likely yes, an HTML doctype is fine.

gstick

8:46 pm on May 24, 2011 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



My interest was in reaching mobile viewers. The Wikipedia article on XHTML gives the impression that HTML 5 is now the interoperability horse that W3C is betting on. This supports g1smd's comment.

The article also reports that "Simon Pieters researched the XML-compliance of mobile browsers[29] and concluded 'the claim that XHTML would be needed for mobile devices is simply a myth'". I will keep my eye on HTML 5.

Thanks for the comments.
 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month