Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

need help with validator

validator

         

Extra_PC

2:08 pm on Mar 8, 2010 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hello


please i need help with this error

2 Errors, 16 warning(s)


# Error Line 344, Column 10: end tag for "ul" which is not finished

</ul>

&#9993;

Most likely, you nested tags and closed them in the wrong order. For example <p><em>...</p> is not acceptable, as <em> must be closed before <p>. Acceptable nesting is: <p><em>...</em></p>

Another possibility is that you used an element which requires a child element that you did not include. Hence the parent element is "not finished", not complete. For instance, in HTML the <head> element must contain a <title> child element, lists require appropriate list items (<ul> and <ol> require <li>; <dl> requires <dt> and <dd>), and so on.
# Warning Line 503, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 507, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 511, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 515, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_link-32.png" alt="" bo…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 610, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 614, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 800, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 1423, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 1710, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_link-32.png" alt="" bo…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 1897, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 1901, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 1905, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 1909, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 1913, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_link-32.png" alt="" bo…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 2224, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Warning Line 2228, Column 1: unclosed start-tag requires SHORTTAG YES

<img class="inlineimg" src="extra-pc/statusicon/subforum_old-32.png" alt="" bor…

&#9993;

The construct <foo<bar> is valid in HTML (it is an example of the rather obscure “Shorttags” feature) but its use is not recommended. In most cases, this is a typo that you will want to fix. If you really want to use shorttags, be aware that they are not well implemented by browsers.
# Error Line 690: Extra content at the end of the document

</li> <li id="forum42" class="forumbit_post L2">

[edited by: jatar_k at 2:56 pm (utc) on Mar 8, 2010]
[edit reason] removed url [/edit]

Fotiman

2:52 pm on Mar 8, 2010 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



This is likely caused by having a <ul> that doesn't contain any <li> elements.

Extra_PC

4:15 pm on Mar 8, 2010 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



i fix all error and warring

thanx ...

[edited by: tedster at 4:40 pm (utc) on Mar 8, 2010]
[edit reason] no personal urls - please! [/edit]