Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.214.35

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Chrome to Phase Out h.264 Codec for < video > Tag

     
11:23 pm on Jan 11, 2011 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 26, 2003
posts:1284
votes: 0


[blog.chromium.org...]



To that end, we are changing Chrome’s HTML5 <video> support to make it consistent with the codecs already supported by the open Chromium project. Specifically, we are supporting the WebM (VP8) and Theora video codecs, and will consider adding support for other high-quality open codecs in the future. Though H.264 plays an important role in video, as our goal is to enable open innovation, support for the codec will be removed and our resources directed towards completely open codec technologies.

These changes will occur in the next couple months but we are announcing them now to give content publishers and developers using HTML <video> an opportunity to make any necessary changes to their sites.


--------

I'm dissapointed.. h264 is already everywhere :(

[edited by: engine at 10:55 am (utc) on Jan 12, 2011]
[edit reason] added quote [/edit]

4:14 am on Jan 19, 2011 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14487
votes: 49


Are there any decent royalty-free codecs out there that ware better than WebM?
9:51 pm on Jan 24, 2011 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 26, 2003
posts:1284
votes: 0


Are there any decent royalty-free codecs out there that ware better than WebM?


Windows (vista or newer) & Mac OSX both already come with h264 codecs by default. They're more than decent. Divx is pretty frequently updated to support new features & enhancements. Nvidia and AMD accelerate H264 very nicely on their gpus to.