Forum Moderators: open
[mydomain.com...] has a PR4 but
[mydomain.com...] has a PR5 ..!
Is that possible? earlier [mydomain.com...] didn't have any PR at all.
Okay, what i have observed is that, [mydomain.com...] had no PR before my site got included in DMOZ, but after inclusion, it has PR4, but [mydomain.com...] got no PR boost as such!
Anyone having same similiar situations with their sites?
Thanks for your input!
Cheers
Also, what I am wondering is, my listing in DMOZ is with www.mydomain.com, but i have got a boost for [mydomain.com!...] This is what really confuses me?
Thanks again
Cheers
I have 4 listings in DMOZ for a site, but with each Google update the category under my home page SERP is "category A", while next month it is "category B".
category A is mydomain.com while B is www.mydomain.com
On the month that category A is under my SERP, I get listed as two seperate sites for a particular search.
Whatever the effects are, part of the influence seems to be DMOZ or PR....
I was thinking that maybe if googlebot spiders your page following a link from domain.com > then > you change the page and it comes from another links as www.domain.com then maybe that's why G bot would make a distinct difference between the pages, otherwise if they match on both spiders they are the same page (?)
Otherwise you are wasting your pagerank and wasting your time.
In case this needs explaining:
You end up having your pr wasted between domain.com and www.domain.com. It's better to have one stream of PR. This can make the difference between being a pr4 and a pr 5 site.
Of course, because these ARE 2 separate sites! Common practice is that most people point both at the same data, BUT THIS DOESN'T HAVE TO BE THE CASE. Google has to allow for the case where there is different content at www.domain.com and domain.com. While Google will merge these in the SERPs, you can lose PR if all links aren't to one or the other.
If Google merges the URLs in the SERPs, then the PR to both URLs does count towards whichever URL is included. As Brotherhood points out, if the content changes between the times that the two URLs are fetched then they probably won't be merged and the PR will be split.
In my opinion, it makes more sense for one URL to issue an HTTP (external) redirect to the other, preferably status 301.
I don't mean to sound skeptical of the people reporting this issue, but can anyone provide a specific example of the "www." making a difference?
That's kind of what virtual hosting is... I have 4 sites all on the same IP.
There's nothing sacred about "www." It could be anything. On one domain, I have mailc., test., www., and a few more I can't remember that all point to the same IP. Apache makes my domain.com and www.domain.com the same site, but the rest are different(like someone mentioned above).
Many sites, possibly most sites on the Net, are configured to allow interchangeable www and non-www addressing of webpages (drudgereport.com is one example). These should AFAIK always resolve to the same IP.
From my limited testing it appeared that Google does indeed roll up www and non-www PR into one number. I was looking for any example of this kind of website which has 2 different PR's.
So I guess Google dont care about IP's, right?
I guess the trick is on how to redirect, right?
Can anyone shed a light for non techie?
( I certainly miss the site search to dig all that up. I used to survive by just asking the server guy to do a 301 redirect. )
Also, I'm sure it's possible to get a site indexed by it's ip if you have links pointing to it, but that ip is going to be considered a url.
Having multiple ip addresses with one domain should not affect it's pr. That would not make sense.