Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

#1 search result site is using witty hidden text

candidate for the spam report?

         

barbos

12:58 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



A site with PR=5 comes up as #1 in Google search ahead of 200,000 others.

The front page is very clean with large central picture and very little text.

However there is a long text in the code hidden within DIV block:

<DIV style="Z-INDEX: 500; TOP: -130px; LEFT: -231px; VISIBILITY: visible; WIDTH: 200px; POSITION: absolute;">

So you cannot find it using select all function because it is always outside of the browser window.

Obviously, Google takes it for real because part of the hidden text appears in the Google description.

Prrety neat, eh? Is it worth submitting to the spam report?

highman

12:59 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Its an old trick, yes report it

Nick_W

1:02 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Rather in-elegant too.

div#hiddentext {
display: none;
]

Not that I'd recommend anyone do it ;)

Nick

barbos

1:06 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm surprised Google can be fooled so easily! 8o

Jakpot

3:23 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Google has been fooled a lot in the latest update

edit_g

3:47 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Not just in the latest update. That trick has fooled them forever... It would, to be fair, not be that easy to spot for little mr. googlebot.

tbear

5:36 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I built a site about 3 years ago with text hidden with same colour background image. It still ranks in googy with pr4. Won't say anything 'cos it's kinda good for me as an ad and anyway they now don't know what they are doing as regards spreading their web wings.
But of course Googy is conned left right and center just like any person/organisation in the world.......
IMHO
:)

wingslevel

6:18 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If I can recall from reading earlier threads on this subject, google has to rely on human reporting for hidden text and 1 pixel gif links.

If that is right, then the spammer's success is going to depend on how many competitors he has, how smart they are and whether they are willing to report him.

Obviously these are good enough odds for lots of folks....

soapystar

7:01 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



nope..it wont depend on that!..google say they prefr to use filters for spam...and only human edit large scale spammers..so.since there is no filter for hidden text on a similar background it will work as a trick even if reported..i know for sure..since i spent a couple of months reporting several competitors all of whom remain indexed and well ranked!....yet all the other engines removed them within a week...seems google really is happy to be a spam engine penalising innocent sites with ridiculous filters and algos!

wingslevel

7:09 pm on Oct 15, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I guess I have had better luck, when I have reported hidden links the sites have been pr0'd - although it took almost 3 months!

Google must have worked hard trying to figure out how to trap these problems with a filter and come up short. I think this is why Googleguy has actively been posting and promoting the spam report link. It will be interesting to see what the response time is on spam reported to this link. Anybody had any experience with this yet?

Iguana

10:21 am on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Surely one problem is that placing a DIV outside of the visible window can be quite valid - I remember using the technique when making some code NS4/IE4/5 compatible (display:none didn't work for NS4 in this instance). I would then switch the hidden section in when required.
On one of my own sites the header is display:none by default - and it is made visible when the page loads outside of a frame.So in both instances there was no spamming going on and I would resent Google banning my pages because of either technique.

It's worth remembering that a lot of spamming techniques don't actually work very well for Google - the page may have it's good position because of good links and good anchor text.

wingslevel

3:27 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



> Surely one problem is that placing a DIV outside of the visible window can be quite valid

Same with 1 pixel gifs, this is why it is so tough to try to automate spam detection....

> It's worth remembering that a lot of spamming techniques don't actually work very well for Google

I think you are right as far as the actual optimization process of a page. There is a vulnerability in the page rank model, though. Let's say you are a web designer/seo with 50 clients - link the home pages of each of your sites to 10 others with a 1 pixel gif. The home page prs might range from 4 to 7 and there won't be any other outbound links on these pages, so the pr effect to the recipient pages will be good. I found and reported one of these, but the only way to get caught is if a competitor studies your inbound links then visits the linking pages and searches the source - kind of an involved process...

soapystar

4:13 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



1 pixel doesnt leave much room for anchor text though..its the anchor text that seems to be most important

miles

4:41 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have been seeing a long track record here of people who think that just because someone has a higher page rank or higher listing than you, they are a spammer. According to the search engines we are all spammers. We optimize a site for a specific reason, listings. For crying out loud beat the people ahead of you at their own game. Its like 1st grade all over again "jimmy got more than I did." Grow up and learn how to do your job better than the guy ahead of you.

There are many of us here who dont whine about someone getting higher listings because we know how to beat fellow spammers at their own game. In most cases it is not even necessary to out spam them all you have to do is build a better site. Get someone to link to you who has higher PR and make your page for the search engine in question. One day when you are all learned up on SEO stuff you will be able to take all of this in and do your jobs better.

soapystar

4:50 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



i believe this thread is about abusing set rules rather than spam. Theres cheating, and theres optimzing.

Powdork

4:56 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I think this thread is spammy. I came here looking for witty text and have found none. Perhaps its hidden somewhere.;)

If someone doesn't put something funny here soon I will report it.

Of course I'm just a webmaster who is upset that this thread is listed above mine in the Google News Forum

heini

5:20 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>i believe this thread is about abusing set rules rather than spam. Theres cheating, and theres optimzing

That belief is based on faulty assumptions, IMO. There are no set rules, really. There's just different interests from different parties.

Powdork, something funny? Ok, I'm just waiting for the day when search engines regard spam reports as spamming their mail boxes... ;)

Paully

7:25 pm on Oct 16, 2002 (gmt 0)



I agree with miles.

Another point to bring up, as GG has said many times, all Google cares about is User Experience. If the "spam" site for example, spam's "Pam Anderson", through the use of hidden links, hidden text, and 1x1 gif's. Yet the site has extreamly good info on Pam -- photos, filmography, messageboard, memoriablia, etc. Then why should G give this site a PR0 and a site with less info, along with less spam techniques an artifical boost? I say let them fight it out, spam techniques, linking crusades, information building, etc.

Seems fair to me.

austtr

12:25 am on Oct 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



miles.... one of the reason's people get pi**ed off and shout "spam" is when they see top ranking sites which clearly use techniques that Google expressly prohibits. Sure there may be other factors involved in getting to the top... but the question for most people is why are the sites still in there if they breach Google's own rules.

The perception is that Google is rewarding sites even though they use "don'ts". Not everyone agrees with "if you can't beat em, join 'em", and if Google's traps and filters don't seem to be catching these "cheating" sites, then people will continue to report them as spam.

Although I must say that I'm surprised a beast as sophisticated as Google seems to battle in picking up hidden text. It has been on the SE's no-no lists since Noah had training wheels.

--------------------------------
Webmaster Dos and Don'ts

Do:

Create a site with content and design that are straightforward, appropriate and relevant for visitors to your site.

Feel free to exchange links with other sites that are compatible with your site's content and users' interests.

Be very careful about allowing an individual consultant or company to 'optimize' your web site. Chances are they will engage in some of our "Don'ts" and end up hurting your site.

Consider submitting your sites to our partner directories Yahoo! and DMOZ.

Don't:

Cloak.

Write text or create links that can be seen by search engines but not by visitors to your site.

Participate in link exchanges for the sole purpose of increasing your ranking in search engines.

Send automated queries to Google in an attempt to monitor your site's ranking.

Use programs that generate lots of generic doorway pages.

------------------------------------

Not exactly ambiguous, is it?

Chico_Loco

4:47 am on Oct 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Would this trick really be that hard to find?

In this case:

if (LEFT =~ '-' ¦¦ TOP =~ '-')
{
Ban this stupid site!
}

snowfox121

12:02 am on Oct 21, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well, said, Miles! I have been guilty, myself, of looking at competitors who are ahead of me in SE results and trying to figure out how they are "cheating." Now I look at what they're doing and try to outdo them by using their best features and improving on my own designs. All it takes, often, is a lot of time -- which i am willing to invest.