Forum Moderators: open
I was getting 7 SERP for a very competitive keyphrase of 3 words in google.co.uk. But from 3 weeks its getting down by 9 then 12.. 15 and now its on 18 th L. Now there are some new sites on page 1 without keywords in title tag. It’s very strange. Suggestions appreciated.
I have a site 10,000 pages four years old, all pages ranking with in the top 30 searches for there given keyword.
I changed the layout of 7,000 pages as somebody had virtually copied my site, the 7,000 pages completelly disappear, well the 3,000 untouched pages stay in exactly the same position.
I think this is proof positive that if you make major changes regardless of the age of your site Google will sandbox you to make sure you are not trying to cheat the rankings.
Also does it register all the links even if you have say 50 from one site? Do the serps treat these links in the same way?
I was ranking great on Google for various two words phrases, I put most of my success down to my internal linking structure, obviously the page was optimised in all sorts of ways but I only began to dominate the serps when I implemented the new link structure.
This all crashed with Austin I believe.
I dont know if this provides any info on your problem but it could be relevant.
It's really easy. You simply need the following:
Good content
A good page title
Lots of links
Good anchor text
Directory listings
Validated pages
Plenty of patience
---> This one is for grandpa (or anyone)-
1) Good content - do you mean this in a quantitative (x% keyword density) or a qualitative way?
2) Lots of links - lots from a few urls or one link from lots of urls
3) What type of directories?
1) Good content - do you mean this in a quantitative (x% keyword density) or a qualitative way?
2) Lots of links - lots from a few urls or one link from lots of urls
3) What type of directories?
1) Both - Obviously keyword density is a factor. Quality content follows research and product promotion.
2) Lots of links from a lot of URL's. Get links to the front page, to the deep pages. Use link text that relates to the page. I take links from almost anyone, related to my industry or not. Obviously, those that are related get my attention first. Put up some outbound only links too. You must have run across a few site that your visitors might appreciate.
3) Google, DMOZ, any niche directory.
I did anchor text optimization even than site is not coming back from 2nd page to 1st page.
You said that the changes have occured over the past three weeks, if you've performed the suggested anchor text "optimization" then it won't affect your site for some time yet.
Most likely you just got hit with an algo change.
Exactly, alot of people sit there with their number one ranking and don't keep up with the current ranking factors or keep on top of their inbound links. If you don't keep working on your site, someone else will overtake you.
I have a site 10,000 pages four years old, all pages ranking with in the top 30 searches for there given keyword. I changed the layout of 7,000 pages as somebody had virtually copied my site, the 7,000 pages completelly disappear, well the 3,000 untouched pages stay in exactly the same position. I think this is proof positive that if you make major changes regardless of the age of your site Google will sandbox you to make sure you are not trying to cheat the rankings.
<snip> Loads of sites add pages every single day which are ranked highly as soon as they hit the index and they stay there. Big sites with high PageRank, high numbers of inbound links, high quality internal linking etc. have no problem bypassing the "new page" filters Google has in place. Also, changes to pages do not result in a drop in ranking unless you made a mistake - fresh content is always welcomed by Googlebot and the new page filter is applied to new pages, not fresh content.
[edited by: ciml at 5:52 pm (utc) on Oct. 22, 2004]
[edit reason] We will keep on topic. Thank you. [/edit]
meeshamosaic if you over-optimize a site, google starts to penalize it for 1-2 phrases you have optimized it for.
What?
Er I just don't understand how Google can read a page, and deduce *which* 1-2 phrases for which you have optimised it, let alone *start* to penalise it. Penalise or *start* to?
Do explain - that's a stunning assumption!
DerekH
seo_sherpa : Would it be possible to give the url of that article. Thanks.
if you rank high with the allin commands and nowhere on the normal serps you are suffering from google-lag/sandboxing.
Yes I think so that sandbox effect happened to new sites only.
I wonder why sandbox is being mentioned here. As MeeshaMosaic says, his site is doing rounds between 10 and 20 and this is no sign of a sandbox.
Also, thought atleast somone will mention, sandbox applies to links (IBLs), not to the sites. Since new sites anyway have new links, they suffer the most.
I'm sick of people trying to pad out their "number of messages" with "I agree" sentences .... what's the point?
Thought I didn't post that "I agree" comment, I fully defend such posts. When so many views and counterviews are being expressed here on a fairly debatable issue, newbies are most likely to get confused and a consensus of some kind will make it clear which way the majority opinion is moving.
Mc
1) How to define overoptimization? Assume this is mostly if not entirely an on page issue.
2) In Brett's 12 month plan he asserts that keyword density should be in the 5-20% range - is something in excess of that too much? Where is the line?
3) Other factors.
All opinions on this are appreciated.
This subject remindes of a comment in the movie Amadeus where the young Mozart hearing a piece by competitor Solieri remarks "No. Too many notes." and then improves on it. So, when is less more?
[edited by: ciml at 5:53 pm (utc) on Oct. 22, 2004]
[edit reason] We will keep on topic. Thank you. [/edit]