Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Dupe content checker - 302's - Page Jacking - Meta Refreshes

You make the call.

         

Marcello

11:35 am on Sep 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My site, lets call it: www.widget.com, has been in Google for over 5-years, steadily growing year by year to about 85,000 pages including forums and articles achieved, with a PageRank of 6 and 8287 backlinks in Google, No spam, No funny stuff, No special SEO techniques nothing.

Normally the site grows at a tempo of 200 to 500 pages a month indexed by Google and others ... but since about 1-week I noticed that my site was loosing about
5,000 to 10,000 pages a week in the Google Index.

At first I simply presumed that this was the unpredictable Google flux, until yesterday, the main index-page from www.widget.com disappeared completely our of the Google index.

The index-page was always in the top-3 position for our main topics, aka keywords.

I tried all the techniques to find my index page, such as: allinurl:, site:, direct link etc ... etc, but the index page has simply vanished from the Google index

As a last resource I took a special chunk of text, which can only belong to my index-page: "company name own name town postcode" (which is a sentence of 9
words), from my index page and searched for this in Google.

My index page did not show up, but instead 2 other pages from other sites showed up as having the this information on their page.

Lets call them:
www.foo1.net and www.foo2.net

Wanting to know what my "company text" was doing on those pages I clicked on:
www.foo1.com/mykeyword/www-widget-com.html
(with mykeyword being my site's main topic)

The page could not load and the message:
"The page cannot be displayed"
was displayed in my browser window

Still wanting to know what was going on, I clicked " Cached" on the Google serps ... AND YES ... there was my index-page as fresh as it could be, updated only yesterday by Google himself (I have a daily date on the page).

Thinking that foo was using a 301 or 302 redirect, I used the "Check Headers Tool" from
webmasterworld only to get a code 200 for my index-page on this other site.

So, foo is using a Meta-redirect ... very fast I made a little robot in perl using LWP and adding a little code that would recognized any kind of redirect.

Fetched the page, but again got a code 200 with no redirects at all.

Thinking the site of foo was up again I tried again to load the page and foo's page with IE, netscape and Opera but always got:
"The page cannot be displayed"

Tried it a couple of times with the same result: LWP can fetch the page but browsers can not load any of the pages from foo's site.

Wanting to know more I typed in Google:
"site:www.foo1.com"
to get a huge load of pages listed, all constructed in the same way, such as:
www.foo1.com/some-important-keyword/www-some-good-site-com.html

Also I found some more of my own best ranking pages in this list and after checking the Google index all of those pages from my site has disappeared from the Google index.

None of all the pages found using "site:www.foo1.com" can be loaded with a browser but they can all be fetched with LWP and all of those pages are cached in their original form in the Google-Cache under the Cache-Link of foo

I have send an email to Google about this and am still waiting for a responds.

Marcello

6:05 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




"I would appreciate a sticky from an admin or mod"

And I would appreciate a reaction from Google or an answer to the emails I have send and to Google and to Adsense

Ok its Midnight here ... i am of to bed

kaled

9:00 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



As I have said in other threads, Google need to be shamed into fixing this - that requires bad publicity.

How about this
1) Take a snaphot of a Google-cached page crediting the copyright to the wrong site.
2) Take a snapshot of the meta redirect code (by disabling such redirects in your browser).
3) Hire a lawyer.
4) Slap Google and the cheating scumbag site jointly with a 100 billion dollar lawsuit - that would probably be the largest claim for punitive damages in history. If that doesn't attract some publicity, we can only assume Google have secretly bought the world's news media.

On the matter of which of two or more pages is original, the only valid test is which page was first indexed. However, if Google don't keep that information then it isn't possible. That being the case, duplicates should only be removed if they are on the same site.

Kaled.

figment88

9:22 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



shamed into fixing

This is a good point. Now that I fully understand the issues, I have got to say I'm outraged. None of my sites have been hijacked, yet, but this is something I should not have to worry about. As the news spreads, it is going to become more and more common.

Fixing this should be priority one for Google.

I recommend:
1) folks going to pubcon getting straight answers out of Google reps.

2) Bay area folks picketing the google-plex (I'm willing to join in). I'm thinking if we can get twenty or so of us down there with signs for half a day and alert the news, this problem will be fixed within a few days.

Critter

9:33 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



<mob>
YAAA!

Let's take them out back the woodshed and beat the sh*t out of them!
</mob>

:)

idoc

9:43 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"run the php link through an html checker to get the meta refresh, I am getting a refresh that may be triggering click throughs to a major search engine company"

I think this aspect frustrates me the most... because the fix to change how to handle 301 and 302 redirects is seemingly simple there *has* to be some reason why it can't just be done simply. I have seen a good number of page hijackers are selling clicks. The search companies have branched off into marketing as a primary focus it seems and maybe this is one of the results.

ownerrim

9:56 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



very scary. i think i will burn a copy of my site to disc along with a snapshot of the google cache of my homepage, mail it to myself (to get a postmark date), and then NEVER open it until the day i need legal counsel to review it.

also, was wondering if periodically varying the wording of the index page's title might help.

mccleark

10:17 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Make sure it is certified mail. The postmark alone is not enough.

cabbie

10:22 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It seems that the same search optimization company is continually being named as the culprit.I know dogboy was talking about these guys.
Why don't you get a few webmasters that are affected together and launch some legal action against them and file a dmca report to google.They are obliged to respond to these.
Send emails to Daniel Brandt at #*$! and try to get some press releases.
Don't sit and do nothing and hope it fixes itself.Get heavy!
and good luck!

my3cents

11:26 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You could spider the offending sites directory for email addresses and send an email to all of the webmasters of the sites being affected.

I'm sure a class action lawyer wouldn't mind getting some press for this.

This is very disturbing, especially if monitary gains are being made by the people doing this.

Do no evil? huh.... sounds pretty evil to me.

bears5122

11:27 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well if Google won't fix it, most people will take advantage of it and I won't blame them.
This 389 message thread spans 39 pages: 389