Forum Moderators: open
However, I saw lots of "informational" sites with Adsense and affiliate links coming on top of serps.
Let me see should I shut down thousands of spamming cookie cutter sites that are producing me millions in revenue through Adsense or should I shut down sites spamming that produce me no revenue. That's a toughy.
Lookee here, if we push content and penalize commerce then people will only find many sites by clicking on our Adsense ads. After all we're in business to make money aren't we.
Are you telling me search engines don't manipulate results as much as the webmasters they accuse of doing it?
Let me see should I shut down thousands of spamming cookie cutter sites that are producing me millions in revenue through Adsense or should I shut down sites spamming that produce me no revenue. That's a toughy.
Google's core product is search. If it delivers lousy search results, it loses traffic, ad impressions, and revenue. IMHO, it's naive to think that Google is going to risk a proven business model by looking the other way when the fast-buck crowd spam its search results (whether with affiliate pages, e-commerce pages, or "cookie-cutter" AdSense sites).
Lookee here, if we push content and penalize commerce then people will only find many sites by clicking on our Adsense ads. After all we're in business to make money aren't we.
There's certainly a precedent for that point of view: In offline media, businesses are expected to advertise when they want to promote their goods and services. Instead of bashing Google, owners of commerce sites should thank Google for the free ride. :-)
Are you telling me search engines don't manipulate results as much as the webmasters they accuse of doing it?
Yes.
I think if you're an information site married to Adsense you should be thanking Adword commerce sites not Google.
The only way to check the abuse with Adsense is to decentralize the policing. I don’t know of many affiliate networks that don’t allow the advertisers to pick and choose their affiliates.
All media including search engines manipulate the final product.
I'm new to the forum but have been lurking for a few weeks.
After seeing almost a 50% drop in backlinks this weekend I've just noticed google reverting back to the old list of links from before the weekend update.
Anyone else seeing this reverse.
---Nevermind just check after 5 minutes and it moved back again to the updated (50% less links)list. Oh well so much for getting my hopes up.
[edited by: JMeeks at 12:03 am (utc) on July 20, 2004]
snipped
[edited by: DaveAtIFG at 12:19 am (utc) on July 20, 2004]
[edit reason] URL removed [/edit]
All a SE DOES is manipulate results.
If the -right- kinds of pages dont show (instead..spam or someones definition of) the algo must be adjusted.
Or apply a manual penalty -site- not page. )
Search engines create algorithms. The algorithms determine the order in which results are displayed.
Webmasters and SEOs, on the other hand, often attempt to defeat the algorithms by artificial means. That's how I'd define "manipulation." If you prefer to use a different definition, that's your privilege, but it's disingenous to pretend that the design and refinement of an algorithm is in any way comparable to black-hat or even grey-hat SEO. The search engine tries to deliver the best possible results for the user; the SEO tries to deliver the results that are best for himself or his client.