Forum Moderators: open
I have recently heard that links.html or links.htm pages are now being ignored by Google.
I cannot find any information to back this statement up but have noticed that a few of my websites have recently lost PR.
Can anyone shed any light on this phenomenon?
Thanks
GoggleEyed
If you are creating a new "links" page, it might be better to call the file, title, something else, (external, friends, bobs-your-uncle, whatever).
But like Steve said, it doesn't seem to be a 100% effect.
i think you should name it "sausages"
Yes, that's a good one.
That's the way sausages were meant to be, all linked in long chains that you could coil over your shoulder for the trip back from the butcher. These days, they're all in stupid little plastic packages, in individual cells, isolated and un-sausage like. And they call it "progress". Bloody fascists.
No, this is not true. Google does not ignore pages simply because of file names such as links.html or links.htm; that's too cheap for the G's engineer to think off. Intention...Either you name the page as links.htm, resources.htm, directory.htm, or sausages.htm - there are no differences among them because your intention is still the same and that is to place the links on that page.
>> I have noticed recently that links to my site from pages named link.**** don't seem to show up in my backlinks. I have also noticed that links from my links.aspx page are not being counted on the other sites.
If you have also seen links from PR4 or PR5 pages such as resources.***, directory.***, or sausages.*** not being shown as backlinks, then you will not be surprise that link.*** may also have the same effect.