Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Florida - Nov 2003 Google Update Part 3

         

LaBonne

5:41 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



continued from: [webmasterworld.com...]

The panic is settling down, the whine of worry is receding to a steady hum in the back of my head, and several recovery plans are forming...

I lost my index page entirely, due to lazy keyword stuffing. My fault! Unfortunately, mine is a very small business: no listing = no food (let alone xmas).

I was planning on overhauling the website anyway, and I've given myself until 1/1/04 before I accept an opening with another business and abandon my own. The question now is: overhaul the index page and resubmit to Google immediately, overhaul the entire website and resubmit the whole thing in a few weeks, overhaul the website (starting with the index page of course) and wait for Googlebot. Time is most definitely a factor.

...are any of these plans likely to restore my index page to the directory before I have to throw in the towel in January?

There are also longer range options of starting over with a new website and closing the old.

Mahalo Nui Loa! (Thank you very much!)

Powdork

4:38 am on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Maybe if we all wrote AOL and Yahoo about the problem search results, something might get done! Yeah Right! I am surprised the media hasn't picked this up yet, Google's results are the worst they have ever been as far as relevance. Link pages are out ranking quality content pages everywhere, Spam rules more than ever, And with the up coming IPO can Google really afford to screw with their core and only business? SEARCH We made Google by word of mouth, it won't be Bill Gates they have to worry about, it's just word of mouth - So Spread the word!
Someone from the NY Times has seen this thread and had already heard about the update but had no idea how serious it was. I would suspect the word will be out tomorrow at the latest.

Friends at the bar just asked me who sang "The dawning of the age of aquarius" Google did not have the answer on the first two pages. Both ATW(sponsored listing) and alta vista had the answer for me on page 1. Yes, the results could be called on target, but they weren't what I was looking for. Google used to be able to give me what I was looking for, not just words.:(

The 5th Dimension

Brett_Tabke

4:44 am on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Alright - it is clear this DISCUSSION needs to go on, but in a civil matter. Leave the pure rants at home. This is too important.

Jessica

2:58 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



sooooo....is the update over?

ulysee

3:06 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In the last 24Hrs one of my sites moved up from the 1000's to 637 and then 120 for a major search term.

Disneyboy

3:12 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)



For the 1st time in a long time, I have needed to go to different search engines other than Google to find what I need during the normal course of searching.

These results are just totally off.

too much information

3:14 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I checked my SERPs this morning and it looks as if all of the datacenters are agreeing. that is except -va

But -va is not much different than the other servers from what I am seeing.

I still am having trouble with the kword1 kword2 kword3 in the title not showing up for the exact same search. But for kword1 kword2 kword3ish search I'm doing very well.

This must have something to do with the broad match thing.

prejudice

3:27 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)



You are all so right, how can this update possibly be over?! More to the point how can my website be on page 1, page 2 and page 3 for the same keyword? No Joke.

Draw your own conclusions.

badtzmaru

3:28 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




I did notice on the -va DC that the "updated" backlinks do not take into account the readjustment of part of the Google Directory tree. Google moved parts of the tree around but didn't spider those parts after the move, the links from the moved section are no longer listed as backlinks.

mr_strong

3:35 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've been checking a few search results.

All I'm getting is guestbook and link pages from sites LINKING to the relevant pages. This is even on relatively non-competitive searches (approx 100,000 searches)

These results can't stay surely?!

otnot

3:36 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I noticed this morning that key-word results no longer bring up my site and that the dance is now affecting -de and -ca as well. It looks like the dance is still on. I don't know about the rest of you but my dancing shoes are just about wore out.

justinsane777

3:37 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Up until today, the keywords I watch hadn't been really thrown for a loop yet. Today, it is all directories, link pages, and a subversive subject that happens to be vaguely intertwined with the keywords on the first page...pretty bad stuff, but luckily a steady base of affiliates helps ride the waves a bit. The SERPS really look like they are backwards...page 100 to 1 in descending order.

In other news, I also went to another engine to look for information today. I hate leaving the familiar feel of google.

merlin30

3:37 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Depending on the keywords I use, I can get all the data centres to agree or produce upto 4 different sets of results.

On the point of being on Page1, Page 2 and Page 3 for the same keyword - this probably means that the servers within a data centre are not aligned in addiition to the data centres themselves differing!

I was sure GG said this update would be complete within 3-4 days. Be nice if we could rewind the thread to before the rants and invite GG to provide some light on the situation.

Goanna1

3:39 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have noticed that adding hyphens between keywords no longer returns SERPS that look like the pre-update SERPS (for missing sites). Anybody else see this?

prejudice

3:39 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)



>>Too many blackhat stratergies I guess ;)

Lol - Far from it, I don't do dirty tactics, but to be on page 1, 2 and 3 for the same keyword sucks compared to when I used to be #1.

I'm not worried YET, long way to go.

superscript

3:42 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)



The update certainly isn't over. I survived Florida and stayed in exactly the same position throughout, but when I checked this morning - my site and my competitor's site - gone! (well, not exactly gone, prob. on page XXX, I didn't even bother to check)

Ouch!

sd2001

3:42 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)



"I have noticed that adding hyphens between keywords no longer returns SERPS that look like the pre-update SERPS (for missing sites). Anybody else see this?"

Yes you are correct not working now.

yankee

3:43 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've always laughed when I read
"For the 1st time in a long time, I have needed to go to different search engines other than Google to find what I need during the normal course of searching. "

This time I agree.

sd2001

3:46 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)



We have had work from some very small directories which haven't sent any work for over a year, people must be looking elsewhere than Google - must be bad.

James_Dale

3:49 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I don't believe GG knows if the update is over. Being here is as much a learning experience for him as it is for us...

However, I am convinced this update is not over - to confirm this you only have to spend a few seconds looking at wildly fluctuating results.

[edited by: James_Dale at 3:49 pm (utc) on Nov. 21, 2003]

Rather be Skiing

3:49 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I noticed yesterday that the hyphen wasn't working as it was in previous days. Hopefully they pulled those results to re-integrate back into the look-ups ;>)

Fiver

3:52 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It's not over no. And www2 is jumping into and out of www for me now for the first time. and I don't like what I see, to put it simply.

TinkyWinky

3:53 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



nope this is definitely not over....

anyone had the googlebot go through - I see nothing across any of my sites now for about a week

I have about 10 all on different IP's, domains and topics - zip!

robinponty

3:05 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi,
I have a site whose 1700 pages were indexed. Slowly and gradually the pages started to decrease from google index from 1100 to 900 to 500 and just 92 now. Home page gone initially and then in 20 days time, all of the site is gone, just the 92 pages. Though if i search on google without www, I mean site:mydomain.com rather than site:www.mydoamin.com, it shows me 600 pages. Has anybody seen this problem of pages being dropped and also this difference between without www and with www on google.
Please advice.

sd2001

4:00 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)



We have been Googlebot'ed 3 days running, still vanished again!

kevinpate

4:01 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



> anyone had the googlebot go through

our logs show a rather hefty bot parade in the early am this morning which wasn't noticeably different from most of their parades. Red carpet guests included google-bot 2.1, slurp/cat, slurp/si, scooter and fast atw-crawler.

caryl

11:59 am on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



OK - for whatever it is worth...

I have been awol from my keyword off and on now. Right now I am OFF.

I just realised that doing a search for my keyword is returning directory listings in some odd order.

We sell widgets. We are listed in G Dir under "Shopping>...>...>etc".

If I do a search for widgets, the results are first a reference to a "new" category "Home> Consumer Information>...>...>etc".

Then the very first positions are from the G Directory ">...>...>Manufacturing".

So, right now a search in regular Google for widgets is EXACTLY the same as when I do a "search ONLY" for Widgets in the G Directory ">...>...>Manufacturing".

No wonder we are nowhere to be found!

caryl

4:02 pm on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think that Google Filters are NOT working correctly.

Do a search on Google for Widgets (literally). Now open another window and got to Googles Directory and drill down into a category.

Do a search in that category for Widgets and be sure to select to "search only in '(category)'".

The results have been identical for me.

If I want to buy a widget I can not even drill the directory to Shopping and then search, hoping to get past the "about widgets, history of widgets, manufacturers of widgets, etc." The same results will come up.

Now, thats relevancy for you!

BryantStevens

6:50 am on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Some had commented on this in the Florida thread, but I didn't see it go very far.

Here is my opinion.

-va does not have an adult filter in place. All others datacenters do. The word "sex" in the search term seems to be having the most filtered results. My one site has ranked on the first page for sex and another keyword for years. Now I can't even find it going 15-20 pages deep on anything but –va. On –va it is still number 1. Other terms seem to be unaffected. But if “sex” is in the search term, my site is no where to be found.

My site is a still a solid PR 5. Searching for the name of the site yields a number 1 result and searching with other adult terms also seem to be unaffected. It is also listed in dmoz.org as a Mature Content site so that might also have an impact.

vonna

11:42 am on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just noticed this message on the -va center, the message is displayed directly on the search page under 'Searched the web for ... results 1 - 10 ...'

-- Message --
By default, Google searches for variations of your search terms. To search only for an exact term, place a '+' sign before it.
--

This message ONLY appear using some keywords ( Not all ), the results that are returned are really bad, If you put a + sign infront of the search the "OLD" great results is displayed ( tried the + sign on www.google.com but it still show the Florida results ).

Could it be that this new search algo is the reason that some sites have problems with the Florida update and others not ( only happens on some terms ) ,

I think: the florida update is all about a PR update , they took a old dataset and now compare it to the fresh crawl , and only links that are in the "old" and in the "new" crawl counts as PR , this way google removes sites that have used blogs - guestbooks - ffa - forums etc. to gain PR ( rotating pages ) , I think that this type of old to new link compare started in september with a month to month compare, but did not do the trick so they took a old dataset and compared to a fresh. If you got problems with the florida update perhaps this is your problem.

Anyway this thread is about the new search algo, to me it looks like really unrelated results, as the message indicate google now search for the keyword you enter but also search for related keywords and then mix the results and sort them by PR.

GOOGLE: I do not think this type of search is why google is popular, on google you should get "exact results", the new type of search is more for a site like ask.com where you do a search and ask.com try to figure out what you want, i know that this is what all search engines wants to be able to do, but i do not see this as a "google thing", well perhaps if you implemented it in another way and not as the default.

English is my second lang. hope you understand me :-)

Tropical Island

11:01 am on Nov 21, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hopefully this will be accepted as a thread.

I woke up this morning to find our main site goone for the keyword that it has ranked well in for years. Never #1 but was #2 and has been in the top 10 for at least 2 years. It has no tricks - normal link exchanging.

The only thing I've done different was to file a spam report yesterday on a term unrelated to our business and used my WW moniker. Hopefully that's not the cause however it does give me pause to think.

This 688 message thread spans 23 pages: 688