Forum Moderators: open
its just one page, blatantly to increase inbound anchor text, and would not pass a hand inspection.
its not currently listed in G, i found it at alltheweb.
my site is no. 2 on google, and nowhere on atw.
should i be worried?
cheers
Those sites would not have a positive effect either unless you built up their PR and who is going to want to link to them?
It's about keywords in the first place.
But even with PR:
Somewhere the PR has to come from initially.
Where is this singularity?
I doubt that there is such a single place where each PR-Quantum comes from :)
I think even a page with 0 PR gives away a microscopic small PR.
"Everything Counts in large amounts" *sing*
[edited by: plasma at 6:00 pm (utc) on Sep. 11, 2003]
From what I've read, your PR is calculated as an average of the PRs of the sites linking to you. If this is the case, how can links pointing to your site not have negative effects on your PR?
If 500 sites link to you and they all have PR0 and you now have a PR5, wouldn't your PR drop?
your PR is calculated as an average of the PRs of the sites linking to you
No.
Definitely not.
Every Link to you adds only PR, it's not the avg.
But if you don't get penalized for 'bad' links why shouldn't _we_ not do this too?
It's frustrating. The bad guys cheat and won't be penalized and we shall play by the rules?
Links pointing to your site don't have negative effects on your listing in google or your PR
While in general this statement is true , there might be exceptions.
we used to be listed (albeit badly) in atw. now, we dont exist. it would be a nightmare if g decided we were trying to trick them.
That means Everybody can get tons of domains with tons of links linking to the 1 and only important site, without being penalized?
Imagine I was a competitor of widget.com and wanted to get them out of google. If all I had to do is just linking to them with a few spam sites that wouldn't make much sense.
@benihana
As long as your site does not link to bad sites you don't have to worry.