Forum Moderators: open
Is that some sort of a penalty for overoptimizing or something like that?
The opposite is also true. I'm finding some things ranking high for seemingly no apparent reason. They have low PR, no ranking for any of the 'allins', yet they are in second place for a highly competitive search phrase. Either Google isn't showing us everything (even with the new backlink update) or these sites are there by mistake.
But who knows...maybe we're all just there by mistake. :)
[webmasterworld.com...] msg #12
BTW : the site is still relatively new, about 2 months old maybe, and still not completely indexed, only about 60% of the subpages are in the index by now, so I guess I will have to wait longer and see what happens.
Problem is, and I am not saying this selfishly, the serps look bad on lots of my keywords. Some of the worst relevance I've seen on Google.
Maybe I'm putting myself on the limb for some folks, because I really think for some people this will border on heresy: I am not convinced of the value of "allinanchor, allintext, and allintitle" as a way of determining how well a site is optimized. My sites easily romp over other sites that score way better than mine for those variables.
Another reason I discount those variables is that those are only three variables- whereas the true determinant- the Google algo, features around 100 variables.
I'm not saying people shouldn't use them as diagnostic tools, just that it's value is very limited- and that's why your site's actual ranking may not match the ranking according to those other variables.
That and the fact that it's only two months old- with the caveat that the recent changeover may have reduced that consideration from the equation.
Just a thought. :)