Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Log file dropping.

Log file referral dropping

         

Beachboy

5:26 am on Jun 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I did a site search and was not able to find anything on this topic, but check it out. Apparently this is a brand new spam technique that clearly works GREAT (at this moment) on Google.

It's similar to guestbook spamming, but sneakier and it doesn't involve guestbooks.

First of all, it's very helpful to have a domain-with-important-keywords-in-the-url.com.

This technique involves a certain very popular statistics program (and perhaps more than one.) Here's how it works:

Find a high-PR site that uses this stats program. Determine whether the statistics are publicly available (and thus subject to being crawled by Googlebot). Also assure that the monthly stats reports have PR. Install a link to that site's index page on your most important page. Click that link a sufficient number of times (or use an automated way to do it) so that your URL is assured of being displayed as one of the top 30 referrers when the current month's stats are published at that site on the first of the next month. Googlebot then crawls that stats report page, finds your domain-with-important-keywords-in-the-url.com and not only sends some PR your way but also tallies the keywords for relevancy.

I spent some hours researching some things this evening and stumbled across this technique. Believe me, it works.

You can prove this to your own satisfaction by noting the keyword-laden-adult-site-urls.com's amongst the top referrers to very unrelated websites. Go to those adult sites, check their backlinks and also note their ranking on Google.

GoogleGuy, are you taking notes?

If anyone wants the name of the stats program, just sticky me.

Luke_SR

11:00 pm on Jun 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



-vitaplease, maybe we'll stop listing it in the backlinks altogether. That would help put peoples' minds at ease, I guess.

I think that since most SEO guys already used to backlinks, even if google stop listing them, someone will easily write a script to show them.
Just my two cents.

WebGuerrilla

11:02 pm on Jun 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member




You don't need a script. All you need is the toolbar and this [alltheweb.com].

coolasafanman

10:43 am on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I would imagine the best thing to do is just ignore these stats pages altogether. If they didn't then google itself would be guilty of log spam, as they generally take up the top 10 or so entries in my logs (bot10,bot11,bot12...)

Visit Thailand

10:51 am on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I would not call this SPAM just desperate!

Wjy spend so much time trying to get into someelses log files when you could be using that time to do something useful.

mil2k

11:49 am on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Maybe because getting links for Adult sites or casino sites is difficult. Normal sites don't link to them. The keyword rich anchor text gain from such selected sites might be of some value.

SilentPartner

1:45 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I experimented with "log spamming" awhile back. It was mildly entertaining for about five minutes. By spamming "high traffic" open logs, I was able to generate a good amount of traffic from other surfers visiting the logs... The great kind of traffic that converts nothing, generates no interest, and helps to distort otherwise good statistical information in my OWN logs.

I do, however, run a few domains on subjects that very people would even know to do searches on. Occasionally, when doing very specific research online, I'll use a program to fake my referring headers ( and other information ) which inserts a specific referral link back to an informational page specially designed for this purpose ( orphaned page ). This is just a note to anyone studying the logs ( not public ).

It's done in an ethical way, is on-theme and generates a bit of targeted traffic. I even invite website owners to email me for a correction to their own referral logs ( although nobody has ever emailed me asking me to provide the authentic referral info! ).

I only use this method, however, with informational websites working on non-profitable projects.

I do find it interesting to see how many webmasters these days actually do check their logs, and I enjoy watching these types of referrals to see where interest is generated. After all, when they land on my entrance page, I know quite abit of information about them already.

ncsuk

1:46 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How about cloaking your log files that could be interesting :)

*Dont try this at home kids

jim_w

2:26 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



GG
vitaplease, maybe we'll stop listing it in the backlinks altogether. That would help put peoples' minds at ease, I guess.

Giving the GG a standing ovation. It would also take a lot of SPAM out and perhaps make google’s employees lives a little easier. Jeeze, the stories about that abuse are endless.

trillianjedi

3:12 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Can I just ask why people don't password protect their stats pages?

I regularly go looking at other peoples - a lot of the time you take a URL, put "/sitestats" at the end of it and you're in. Can provide useful information as to the best referrers.

Is this just ignorance do you think?

TJ

coolasafanman

3:22 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



i found an entry in my logs for an seo company's stats page, where my site is listed as a referrer. i guess that's one reason for making stats public.

trillianjedi

3:25 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



i guess that's one reason for making stats public.

I'm not with you - can you explain what you mean?

TJ

optisoft

4:46 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I would like to see this topic deleted. I dont see how posting spam method's publicly is a good idea. I find the best way to tackle such problem's is contact the top of the software tree of the exploit. I.E. with this scenario the software company that produce's this stat software could also add a robots crawl block of the stats directory, to any robots.txt - if not available, create robots.txt, upon install. Now however, thousands of desperate and greedy webmaster's will be making use of this exploit, im sure.

pixel_juice

4:49 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>thousands of desperate and greedy webmaster's will be making use of this exploit, im sure.

But if as GG says, it doesn't work, then we've managed to distract a whole bunch of spammers from doing stuff that might have a real impact ;)

Beachboy

5:01 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Did GG say it didn't work? I recall him saying it would be a good idea to make those stats pages not show up in backlinks. I see plenty of evidence the technique works. I would think a more appropriate thing for Google to do is make the technique ineffective rather than just hiding the stats pages from backlinks display.

WebGuerrilla

5:02 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>But if as GG says, it doesn't work

That's a Big If

You might also want to consider the fact that it is in Google's self-interest to convince as many people as possible that it doesn't work.

The Subtle Knife

5:08 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



jesus christ, if a new hole in google
is found, for the love of god, why post it here?

Surely googleguy and google will see it,
and that route will be eventually not work!

Which beg's the question...

How can we exploit things as long as possible without
people like googleguy spoiling the fun?

trillianjedi

5:09 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Personally I think it's much better to have these things out in the open. That way they get rectified.

No-one has actually answered my question as to why they leave their stats open to be viewed by the public in the first place though?

TJ

The Subtle Knife

6:01 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




Personally I think it's much better to have these things out in the open. That way they get rectified.

Spoil Sport. ;-)


No-one has actually answered my question as to why they leave their stats open to be viewed by the public in the first place though?

Jesus christ, by the fact no-one has replied
should clearly give you the answer.

PEOPLE ARE LAZY.

It's all about human nature.. the real question
is how can google crawl web - stats, if the URL is not public?

Beachboy

6:05 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Google isn't crawling unavailable stats pages. It will only find those it can find. Do a Google search for ... ummm ... the first two words of the title of this thread. I believe you will find a whole lot of publicly available stats pages.

The Subtle Knife

6:11 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The thing is how would you goto their site,
with your site as the referrer?!
so you appear in the stats?
Some of them, you have to have thousands of clicks to appear
in the top 10 referrer list,
there is no-way that is hand, done, must be automated?

I can see how you can easily find stats pages. ;-)

Beachboy

6:17 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I found a lot of PR4 and PR5 stats pages where you could get in the top referrers list with as few as 20 clicks.

optisoft

6:44 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hell if u cant beat em' join em'. Im greedy enough and now taking bid's on custom automated stats marketing programs. sticky me contact info :)

Chris_R

7:14 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



You guys are forgetting - the true danger is with invisible text.

Threads like this are getting ridiculous.

This stuff has been around for a long time.

So has guestbooks.

If people would take the time to research the stuff - they would see google has stated they aren't counting these backlinks.

Then again - if people took the time to research this stuff - they wouldn't need to whine and complain here - as they could actually rank well in the SERPS.

WG may be right - that isn't what I am talking about.

Go back to using everyones favorite SEO technique:

[google.com...]

Now what do we have - dozens of PhDs working on invisible text filters [that never was a problem] so webmasters can sleep at night feeling that everything is fair.

Now google is going to probably spend time in removing the guestbook & log entry backlinks - so webmasters stop their whining.

All this does is waste google's time. Why do you think they have the submit url page? So they don't have to answer emails about it. Same with the invisible text filter.

There will always be something to whine about. There will always be people doing whatever they can to get ahead. As long as there are billions of webpages out there - and money to be made - there will be "spam".

The spammers are getting better and better - the good spam doesn't look like spam - will steal your sales - and there is nothing you can do about it - cause it doesn't break any of the rules.

Guess what? The whiners and complainers will have rock solid good converting pages out there that beat them - and there will be nothing you can do about it.

bolitto

7:16 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>Personally I think it's much better to have these things out in the open. That way they get rectified.

Hi guys, just joined after lurking here for a long time.

I also would like to tell Beachboy and others who are discussing this kind of hole up in the open that the last time I found one such hole in Google, that was back in March 2001, I immediately launched a site to exploit said hole.

The result?

It was banned!

But only in January 2003!

Which translated to a brand new Corvette and a trip to Europe for 1 month, all paid with Google's hole.

So if you didn't have a reason for keeping quiet about this kind of thing, there you go!

LOL - He found a new bug and rushed to tell Googleguy, which shows you're a nice person too but if Googleguy knew how to make $$$ from such knowledge he probably would too Beachboy!

It's not ugly to make money from your research boy! Now wait till you discover the next one, cuz this one is out there for the spammers to beat you now.

I just think there are youngsters on this biz that need to learn capitalism before rushing to tell their competition of their new techniques.

Long live this forum, thank you for such an informational resource.

Beachboy

7:23 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Oh I suspect GG is bringing down a salary in the low six figures and doesn't need to capitalize on this or any other technique. I think this technique will prove to be ineffective and maybe dangerous in the short term.

pixel_juice

7:31 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>You might also want to consider the fact that it is in Google's self-interest to convince as many people as possible that it doesn't work.

Hey, mine too ;)

bolitto

7:33 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>GG is bringing down a salary in the low six figures

But are YOU bringing in a sallary in the low six figures?

By the way, my vette was the U$ 52.000,00 model, convertible with optionals. Trip to europe was U$ 2700,00 only, stayed in cheap places.

Still have U$ 4000 to play with from the last Google trick I kept quiet.

>doesn't need to capitalize on this or any other technique

But I thought YOU would like to capitalize on this! I surely know what Google is making in terms of $.

If you don't want the cash then nevermind please, just ignore my post.

2_much

7:35 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Do I remember correctly that this board is all about sharing SEO and marketing techniques?

Sure, some of them are "borderline", but we're not running a church here or moral police, where running an SEO board.

Thanks for the tip BeachBoy.

Herath

7:40 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>No-one has actually answered my question as to why they leave their stats open to be viewed by the public in the first place though?

trillianjedi, Most of the people publish their logs to brag about their traffic to the potential banner advertisers. Maybe this thread will make them removing the logs from public folders.

AAnnAArchy

8:39 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Most of these people probably don't know their logs are public (Webalizer stats often are) or don't know how to hide them because they're being provided by their hosting company. I highly doubt any of the owners of these sites have their stats viewable for bragging.
This 93 message thread spans 4 pages: 93