Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Log file dropping.

Log file referral dropping

         

Beachboy

5:26 am on Jun 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I did a site search and was not able to find anything on this topic, but check it out. Apparently this is a brand new spam technique that clearly works GREAT (at this moment) on Google.

It's similar to guestbook spamming, but sneakier and it doesn't involve guestbooks.

First of all, it's very helpful to have a domain-with-important-keywords-in-the-url.com.

This technique involves a certain very popular statistics program (and perhaps more than one.) Here's how it works:

Find a high-PR site that uses this stats program. Determine whether the statistics are publicly available (and thus subject to being crawled by Googlebot). Also assure that the monthly stats reports have PR. Install a link to that site's index page on your most important page. Click that link a sufficient number of times (or use an automated way to do it) so that your URL is assured of being displayed as one of the top 30 referrers when the current month's stats are published at that site on the first of the next month. Googlebot then crawls that stats report page, finds your domain-with-important-keywords-in-the-url.com and not only sends some PR your way but also tallies the keywords for relevancy.

I spent some hours researching some things this evening and stumbled across this technique. Believe me, it works.

You can prove this to your own satisfaction by noting the keyword-laden-adult-site-urls.com's amongst the top referrers to very unrelated websites. Go to those adult sites, check their backlinks and also note their ranking on Google.

GoogleGuy, are you taking notes?

If anyone wants the name of the stats program, just sticky me.

WebGuerrilla

9:39 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>I highly doubt any of the owners of these sites have their stats viewable for bragging.

Actually not true. You would be suprised how many sites put up "check out our stats" links. And for the record, log spamming is as old as dirt. It has been a staple of the adult/gaming industry since free stats programs came in existance.

Beachboy

9:59 pm on Jun 6, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I can imagine how impressed visitors to a regular business or non-profit site must be to see a hundred thousand bot hits a month from pr0n sites. Logspamming is no longer just for adult and gaming sites. I bet credit repair, Viagra and mortgage companies are jumping in right now with both feet.

mil2k

5:13 am on Jun 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Maybe this thread will make them removing the logs from public folders.

I doubt any Regular WW member would have kept his stat public in the first place. As for the others what can i say ;)

Hollywood

7:41 am on Jun 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Good luck folks with this, if you do this for a client be prepared to suffer and possibly loose your position as SEO.

Not something you should do, it may work a few days and then your SERPS are gone, Google is surly onto this one, beware what you do to get ahead.

Hollywood

mil2k

10:02 am on Jun 7, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Message 49 has far bigger implications then i initially thought. Thank you Beachboy :)

Brett_Tabke

8:36 am on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>Apparently this is a brand new spam technique

I know of atleast 4 members here that were doing it as early as 98.

Search way - way back in the forum archive and you'll find all kinds of mentions of quality log file stuffing.

It's as ancient as pagerank itself.

There are many bots that are running - have been since late 98 that log file or referral spam. Same stuff - different day.

No worries at all and only t's off webmasters. Google can filter that stuff in a heart beat.

"We think we are spam proof" (Sergey Brin - SES San Fran 1999

chiyo

9:22 am on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm a regular user of this board, and we openly published our log reports. We were not worried about people seeing our links-in, as most of these were from insitutions, quality sites, and universities which didint have any linking policy - they just published links on their own accord and no amount of asking would make them add another link unles it wa a genuinely useful link and passed their approval process.

What we thought we had found was a great daily changing site map/authority link page! Until the log spammers turned up and then we removed the reports from public view pretty quick! If it wasnt for those, we would still be publishing our stats in the open.

swones

10:58 am on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I had a look around google for some openly linked stats pages and couldn't find any with enough PR to bother about anyway, those that had a PR at all were indeed full of gambling/sex sites in the referer list.

Simon.

Yidaki

11:55 am on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



<sidetopic>
>Referral Drops - Comes Around for Bite #2
he, he, even a ole, rewarmed debate can make it to the index page ... ;)
... not that it's not still interesting though!
</sidetopic>

It's surprising how many logs are still open to the public these days ... still a point to watch for google also obviously ... a google for <snip>removed the query example 'cause i don't want to give hints on dodgy tactics, cyril ;)</snip> returnes less pages than before dominic, if memory serves me right ...

[edited by: Yidaki at 1:24 pm (utc) on June 9, 2003]

cyril kearney

1:18 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am always amused by the outrage of the users of this site over spam when it concerns email.

When the spamming concerns search engines, it is applauded as the latest and greatest SEO technique.

Falsification and fraud are falsification and fraud any place they are used to my way of thinking.

I see the chief difference is that there aren’t a lot of companies churning up spam-rage while selling panaceas in this area.

I think postings that explain how to cheat are inappropriate and should be removed!

Yidaki

1:27 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I think postings that explain how to cheat are inappropriate and should be removed!

Cyril this is true for true hints. Log spamming is damn old stuff and far away of a succefull cheating tactic.

DaveN

1:39 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



just search for a BOT [google.com] to see open log files

Dave

jim_w

1:46 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I think postings that explain how to cheat are inappropriate and should be removed!

On the other hand, it may get someone with their logs in view, and did know this goes on to hide their logs.

DaveN

1:57 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I think postings that explain how to cheat are inappropriate and should be removed

I disagree this forum is about what happens in the internet industry. I would hate to see post like:

Just add <snip> tag with <snip> and link to <snip> will get you a automatic +Pr2 Bonus.

freedom of speech and all that, anyway if everbody spammed logs google would just stop logs appearing in the serps.

Dave

cyril kearney

2:33 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



DaveN says:
"freedom of speech and all that"

This is not a freedom of speech issue. We are in the Webmasterworld domain. They already have policies that allow them to delete part or all of posts. My thought is that this should be covered by their policy.

Freedom of speech is involved when a person with a opt-in newsletter has his newsletter filtered out by an ISP trying to reduce traffic. The difference is that the newsletter is a legitimate communications while instructions on how to cheat are illegitimate.

notsleepy

6:52 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Can I just ask why people don't password protect their stats pages?

trillianjedi i do the same.

i often examine competitors by trying
/stats/
/wwwstats/
/webstats/
/awstats/ (a nice one to find and very common)

DaveN

6:57 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Can I just ask why people don't password protect their stats pages?

Why do people stand outside cash machines counting their money.

Hunters and Prey

Dave

Yidaki

7:13 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Why do people stand outside cash machines counting their money.

rofl!

<ot - no further discussion about this please:>
Another one: why do people put their url in their profile?
</ot>

rintrah

8:59 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Who in the heck would post their WebTrends stats publically anyway?

Yidaki

9:19 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Who in the heck would post their WebTrends stats publically anyway?

many, many, many ... and not only webtrends! I've been surprised that a friend whose site i started to redesign, informed me about *ALL* important keywords/phrases, *ALL* referers, *ALL* most visited pages of her competition ... it's been a quite easy job for me, in fact. Life is a bitch but sometimes also a lady. ;)

Beachboy

10:35 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Brett says it's an old technique. Perhaps but the thing that makes it different this go-round (I think) is the way the domains are configured. They are doing this to get some PR, of course, but also to capitalize on keywords-in-domains by hyphenating them. That seriously boosts positioning when the search kw phrase matches the keyword-phrase-in-hyphenated-domain.com. Does it work? Oh yeah. Can Google filter it out? Oh yeah. Should Google filter it out? Oh yeah. Should WW delete threads like this? Heck no.

kpaul

12:36 am on Jun 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



trillianjedi i do the same.

i often examine competitors by trying
/stats/
/wwwstats/
/webstats/
/awstats/ (a nice one to find and very common)

Please note I had my camo jammies on when i tried this.

If you want to stay clandestine about it, try an allinurl for one of the above directory names (there are more i imagine) and look at the cache. The info may be a little dated, but if you look at the site itself, someone may notice you looking and finally lock the door.

Although if it's open in the first place, maybe they're not even looking at the logs. I just mention it because it happened to me a few weeks back - i noticed that it was open after someone just typed it in... ;)

berli

3:01 am on Jun 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



People used to post links to their stats pages the way they'd have counters on their sites. Many university/institutional sites still have their stats available (and linked to). It's basically a vanity thing (kewl! we got visitors from Japan!, etc).

I've noticed a lot of people use that site-tracker service and leave it open to be viewed. With a little tweak to your bot I bet that could be spammed easily, because we're talking the same sort of users who have prefab guestbooks, and heaven knows those are easy to spam . . .

remembering the days when my first guestbook was spammed, long, long before google . . . back when the spammer expected the site operator or site visitors to click on the link, and sometimes they did . . .

abcdef

3:11 am on Jun 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



this whole thing is so not new. and it's not only one stat program that does that. many stat programs have the reports, that are built in html pages, stored at the web site of the host site. it's common. our stat program stores our statistics reports on our web site. big deal.

no secrets being revealed here. neural marketing actually is a better and more common name being used for it.

mil2k

5:56 am on Jun 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



This is one of the best Open discussion thread since a long time :)

i often examine competitors by trying
/stats/
/wwwstats/
/webstats/
/awstats/

Just to add a bit of twist i can make a dummy folder like stats/ and a dummy file in it which will send my competitors on a wild Goose chase ;) They will feel not so smart at the end of the exercise.

Dynamoo

9:39 am on Jun 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



We're NOT talking about hidden stats pages here. If the stats pages are hidden, Google won't see them. BFD.

We're talking about public stats that are published on the bottom of the web pages. I'm not going to tell you how to find these, but once you know what you're looking for you can find them by the shedload.

These are the sorts of stats that require javascript embedded in the HTML. All you'd need to do is rip off the tracker code and create fake referrals a few thousand times and you'd be there. You wouldn't even need to generate any load on the "victims" server, because you would be ripping off the javascript and hosting it yourself.

Well heck, in doing that you've probably broken a load of TOSes and will eventually PR0 your site for ever I guess, but that's really up to you. Personally I like to get my links the hard way :)

rfgdxm1

11:30 am on Jun 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I've noticed a lot of people use that site-tracker service and leave it open to be viewed.

Yes, and I've gotta figure the only reason this surprises some here is that they are e-commerce web whores who would worry about the competition knowing things that they don't want them to. Stop and think of the tons of amateur sites out there. Typically these webmasters could not care less if other people see their stats.

>remembering the days when my first guestbook was spammed, long, long before google . . . back when the spammer expected the site operator or site visitors to click on the link, and sometimes they did . . .

Quite a few today still do. Check out some random guestbooks. Much of the spam includes blatant sales pitches for generic Viagra, free porn, etc. If the bots were doing this just for Google to find the link, they'd leave out the sales pitch. This may make it too obvious, and the guestbook owner delete the entry.

trillianjedi

12:23 pm on Jun 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



People used to post links to their stats pages the way they'd have counters on their sites. Many university/institutional sites still have their stats available (and linked to). It's basically a vanity thing (kewl! we got visitors from Japan!, etc).

Problem is you're giving away valuable information which should be confidential. Your link partners, keywords that your competitors site might be missing etc etc

A crazy idea. If you want to show off, then build a script that gives part of the stats but not the whole detail. But if you need to do that, you don't have a very good website. Modesty is the true indication of a great and succesful site.

Incidentally, I found one of our competitors had their raw logs available today just by guessing around at urls. I got a lot of info from that - and it's going to hurt them in a few months time..... ;)

TJ

The Subtle Knife

2:57 pm on Jun 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Chris_R

The spammers are getting better and better - the good spam doesn't look like spam - will steal your sales - and there is nothing you can do about it - cause it doesn't break any of the rules.

If it doesn't break the rules, how the hell is it spam?

It's just someone doing a better job right?!

DaveN

4:45 pm on Jun 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If it doesn't break the rules, how the hell is it spam?

who's rules mine or yours

DaveN

This 93 message thread spans 4 pages: 93