Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

actual meaning of disabled?

         

miguelito

2:37 am on Feb 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I received one of the dreaded google letters today (about one hour ago)

<snip "invalid clicks email">

Iīm not about to howl in protest that i am innocent because that does no good, although i am totally confused about this after 6 months of using them.In actual fact, although the web site has over 250,000 hits a day the number of clicks has steadily been going down so the accusations of false clicking is a mystery to me, the click through rate has never been higher than 0.3 %

My real question is this..disabled is their polite way of saying "terminated"? and does that mean i can kiss goodbye to the money i made in january and the money i made so far this month?

thanks

[edited by: Jenstar at 2:48 am (utc) on Feb. 12, 2005]
[edit reason] No email quotes as per TOS, thanks! [/edit]

level80

5:59 am on Feb 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Why don't you write back and ask them for specifics? If they were cancelling your account I would've thought the language would've been clearer. Perhaps if the invalid clicks problem is sorted out to Google's satisfaction (for instance there was something you could do to reduce it) they will reinstate your account.

However if you read the terms you'll see that Google have the right to cancel at any time and keep the outstanding monies if they so wish.

miguelito

7:11 am on Feb 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



yeah i did that thanks and they sent me another email with a host of questions which i have answered and they said they will review my account.
Thing is, on a site that has 25,000 google clicks a month, i imagine that one or two people have gone crazy on ad clicking either through mailcious sabotage or because they honestly believe they are helping me...what can i do to stop that other than to ban IPs? and they refuse to discuss IP details!
After six months the click rate has been reducing whilst the traffic increases so i find it strange that now they decide to say something is wrong...itīs really frustrating because i am not a fraudster as a lot of people seem to think everyone in this situation is...i even spend all day removing all comments from the site saying "what are the ads for" "how much do they pay" as people inevitably ask on a discussion board.
I canīt really complain because google are not obliged to provide me with the service but i do think they can do more to advise webmasters of any potential problems so we can try and deal with it instead of just closing accounts with no notice.
The ramifications are obvious...competitors can effectively have you blacklisted just by clicking.With 1,000 people on the site at peak times, i canīt believe that a majority of the 25,000 clicks are invalid..they have never discounted a single cent before this closure.

level80

7:25 am on Feb 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



After six months the click rate has been reducing whilst the traffic increases so i find it strange that now they decide to say something is wrong

CTR depends on a lot of things - the ads shown, where they are, what colours you use, also people increasingly use ad blockers... are you serving ads to the 11% of ppl without javsascript (who can't see the Google ads)? If so you could switch to that ad all the time whilst the problems with Google are sorted.

I canīt really complain because google are not obliged to provide me with the service but i do think they can do more to advise webmasters of any potential problems so we can try and deal with it instead of just closing accounts with no notice.

You should have site logfiles of your own to look at (and could track the clicks on the ads if you so wished). For minor infringements (where it's genuine) they won't suspend the account. In this case they don't want any more invalid clicks which is why they've suspended your account pending review.

miguelito

6:48 pm on Feb 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



thanks for that, if anyone can recommend software to track all these stats and detect any invalid practices etc i would really appreciate it as i confess to being a bit of a novice at all that.
i have tried sql queries but i am out of my depth..with 6 months with adsense and 25,000 ad clicks a month, i canīt see anything unusual, particularly when they refuse to tell me when the problem occured, for how long and for what duration or on which of the three sites i have, it happened.

if i have 250-300,000 page impressions a month over 3 sites i guess i might be better forgetting about adsense and using a system that pays via page impression but which ones are best (except fastclick)?

thanks

jetteroheller

1:41 pm on Feb 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



When You are really inocent,
file a criminal act against John Doe.
You loose much money by aspersion.
Somebody makes click froud and You are the victim loosing Your revenues. That's aspersion.

With this paper, Google will have to release all the information about the click froud.

Google can not hold back information necessary to brighten a criminal act.

miguelito

1:56 pm on Feb 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I wish it were that simple but they said they re-reviewed my account completely and found invalid clicks and confirmed that they will keep all the $ 4,000 i made in january plus $ 1,500 from february.

The TOS gives them the power to do what they want....i donīt argue that they found click fraud...with over 13,000 visitors a day, someone could have clicked on everything for whatever reason but i donīt believe that every one of the 25,000 plus clicks was fraudulent.

Here is the question....there seems to be a contradiction between posting provisional earnings and then adjusted confirmed earnings (no doubt to deduct invalid clicks) and their draconian practice of immediately suspending an account where they find click fraud....this surely is not compatible....whatīs the point saying they will adjust earnings to deduct invalid clicks when you know they will cancel your account the minute they find any?

What really pisses me off is not the money, itīs the fact that google has given its advertising clients 7 weeks free advertising on my websites without having to pay a single cent since they suspended my account and refuses to even give me a clue as to what went wrong or why they did it. That surely is not ethical.

Bluepixel

5:20 pm on Feb 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I bet the advertisers don't get a refund. :-)
Sorry to hear that it happened to you :-(

PatrickDeese

5:35 pm on Feb 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



> I bet the advertisers don't get a refund.

I bet they do. I've gotten money refunded from adwords on a number of occasions.

Miguelito, sorry that your account was cancelled.

Is it possible that instead of someone "clicking on everything" , that some of the content on your site was violating someone else's copyright or that you had placed incentives on your pages (like "click on these ads to support our site"), or something of that nature.

miguelito

6:04 pm on Feb 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I understand what you guys are saying.
Personally, i used to scan all the discussion forums on my site with a laser everyday and sure enough, a few people commented along the lines of "what are those ads for"? do they work well? how much money do they bring in? but only on maybe 4 or 5 occassions over 6 months.
It became an obsession of mine to remove them as soon as possible...knowing that it was prohibited to talk about them at all..i even finished putting word filters like "google,ads,click" etc to stop people talking about it.
Therefore, i think i did the best i could to cover myself on that point and i would never kill the goose that laid the golden egg by inviting people to click on them...there was no need to with all the traffic i got.
Copyright canīt be a problem..they reviewed the site before they said yes and we are not involved in anything illegal or even shady.They said "invalid clicks" not "unsuitable site".

I just hope that my case (and subsequent stupidity) serves as a warning for other new webmasters... I was doing so well with google that i decided to concentrate full time on the sites i have and give up my job in the real world at the ripe old age of 39. I gave it 6 months to make sure it was stable and growing and then left work. Two days later, google pulled the plug so now i am looking for other sponsors just to survive.I hope nobody else in here does this because you never know when it can all come crashing down.

sorry for all the metaphors.

europeforvisitors

6:21 pm on Feb 19, 2005 (gmt 0)



Here is the question....there seems to be a contradiction between posting provisional earnings and then adjusted confirmed earnings (no doubt to deduct invalid clicks) and their draconian practice of immediately suspending an account where they find click fraud....this surely is not compatible....whatīs the point saying they will adjust earnings to deduct invalid clicks when you know they will cancel your account the minute they find any?

They don't necessarily cancel your account the minute they (or you) find invalid clicks. Some of us have been targeted by "click attacks" without having our accounts disabled or even suspended. IMHO, it probably isn't a bad idea to notify AdSense Support if you see any obvious anomalies in your reports. (I once had daily earnings that were about $1,300 higher than normal, so I notified Google. After the second click attack nearly a year later, I did the same thing. This probably helped to establish my credibility with Google.)

miguelito

7:06 pm on Feb 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



fair enough but itīs difficult to inform them of something that doesnīt exist (as was my case) my earnings never varied from $ 85 - $ 170 every day this year, with the majority being between 120-140 and the same for the total clicks...in fact they were slightly down from december when they confirmed and paid every click.
in november i had 23,000 clicks december i had 19,000 clicks and 22,500 in january.

gamiziuk

7:53 pm on Feb 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Two days later, google pulled the plug so now i am looking for other sponsors just to survive.

Look over in Forum 20 [webmasterworld.com] where some alternatives are discussed: Kanoodle, Adbrite, Linkworth, Adsonar.

Give them a tryout and let the rest of us know how you make out with them!
;)

rfung

3:39 pm on Feb 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



wow, this is an eye opener. I've quit my job since October and most of my income 80%+ comes from adsense.

I've thought about trying to protect myself by creating a few DBA (doing business as) business entities and then having different adsense accounts for each site to protect myself.

Has anyone tried doing this?

or perhaps create an adsense account under a relative and put it back on the site?

or, let us know how Kanoodle/adsonar might be working for you?...

miguelito

3:55 pm on Feb 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Iīll report back to you guys as to how the other companies pan out but at the moment i have to say that none of them come close to adsense and income has dropped about 90%. I donīt think that having different adsense accounts will protect you as i imagine it is the site that is blacklisted as well as the registered account holder.
What really makes my blood boil is when you read topics on tech sites regarding online piracy etc and suddenly the google ads are proudly adverting "free warez downloads" "get the new hollywood films here" or "MP3 downloads at low price of all top albums"
It seems that their moral high-ground only matters with the publishers, not the sellers.
What i mean is, google can go ga ga over what they secretly determine are invalid clicks but they have no problem in actively promoting piracy as long as the seller helps to fill their pockets....there must be something wrong with that!

jetteroheller

4:35 pm on Feb 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Did You discuss this in Your website forum?

Maybe all happened because somebody had a strange idea about helping You.

Maybe if the offender writes You,
that he had only very strange ideas about helping,
You could report all to Google and sort it out.

It happened to me some years ago to bid
on a digital camera at Ebay.

This brought me nearly a conviction.

The seller in the US wrote only 10% of the
real value on the customs paper.

I had been for this several hours at a
interrogation at the customs.

I wrote the seller, why he wrote the wrong
value on the customs paper.

He wrote me back, that he thought it's polite
to write a far lower value on the customs papers.

I forwarded this email to the customs,
and this ended the criminal proceeding against me.

So stand up and fight, if You know You are right.

miguelito

5:13 pm on Feb 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



thanks for the input but again i repeat, how can you fight against something invisible?
like most internet companies their TOS is designed to allow them to do whatever they want with no comeback.
i canīt fight against a company that refuses to even discuss what they found or when and where.
this isnīt a legal situation where you are given direct accusations you can defend yourself against...there is nothing to defend against because you donīt know what is going on.
itīs like a schoolboy tease in the playground "i know there is something bad but iīm not telling you what"
i have to move on, get on with my life and forget about google.
iīve only written so much about it here because i donīt want anyone else to fall into the trap that i did.

jetteroheller

5:31 pm on Feb 20, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



You have a direct accusation.

Now it's Your turn to defend Yourself.

I once became black listed in Infoseek.

They wrote me a lot of accusations.

I had to find out what accusations are
useabale to my case.

I found out that a organisation change of
my site with some .htaccess redirects
had been the cause for the trouble.

I wrote them exactly what I found out about
their list of accusations and I was back in Infoseek.

So try everything what I wrote.

1.) Dicuss in the forum the case
2.) If it not helps, file a criminal act against John Doe

Do everything to show Google that You are innoncent.

That's like one of the thriller movies like
"You have 24 hours to proof Your are innocent,
or You go to the electric chair"

The situation will not be solved by wailing around.

fm101

7:01 am on Feb 25, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well they disabled my acc yesterday, and when I ask for possible reason,

<snip>

I haven't get too many clicks just 10-30/day on average, when I checked my acc last time day before yesterday there were only few clicks till that time.

I was member of adsense about 8-10 months and got payments every month on time, Just wonder what happen with my acc, however now it looks like adsense past story for me.

[edited by: Jenstar at 7:07 am (utc) on Feb. 25, 2005]
[edit reason] Sorry, no email quotes please, as per TOS [/edit]

svcglobal

12:08 am on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Miguelito, I am now in your "stage 1". Got today that email about "hey mr., your account disabled" by invalid clicks.
Probably they will do exactly the same - ripe off January and February account values.
Good move to refill a cashflow, right?

PatrickDeese

12:40 am on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



> Good move to refill a cashflow, right?

Considering that they refund the clicks to their advertisers, I don't think so.

Welcome to Webmasterworld.

fairguy

5:13 am on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



When I was dropped from google I believe in november 04 I have received check in December. So google paid everything to me to the last day they canceled my account. So they may do the same.

svcglobal

12:12 pm on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks, Patrick. Its nice to be here.

farguy, hope that they will pay for every cent the site earned and I would be nice to have an explanation from G between disabled and terminated account.
Anyway, I just removed all G javascript inserts. That's enougth for me.
Will focus now on the site main business, more profitable.

miguelito

1:32 pm on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hell i hope they pay for it as well but i would find that strange when they claim there are invalid clicks...why would they pay me every cent for them?
if they consider there are some invalid clicks and they pay me in full, then they are conning the advertisers.That is not going to happen.
They already wrote me saying they were going to refund invalid clicks to their advertisers but yet again, with no more details other than confirming they would not pay me a cent of the $ 5,500 that sits on the account.
They refuse to tell me anything about the number of invalid clicks they found but i canīt see how it can be more than 20 or 30 from about 25,000, seeing as i had no master plan to defraud them and have almost 265,000 page impressions a day anyway....probably someone somewhere left his/her PC running with a 5 year old click happy kid having fun.

oddsod

1:55 pm on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hope this helps, guys.

1. Google's claim of invalid clicks may have nothing to do with invalid clicks per se. This has been discussed here often. When they want to terminate your account for whatever reason they could claim invalid clicks (and probably do). So examine everything. Read the TOS word for word, examine every page of your site. Did you add a Google search box to a page without realising that you already had three ads on the page? That's a violation! Did you forget to remove another contextual ad from the page before posting Adsense? That's a violation! Was there some old text on a 10 year old page that said "Please visit our advertisers"? That's a violation! Is there some javascript or other problem on any page that causes it to automatically refresh? That's a violation! Do you have an SSI serving Google ads to all pages including 404 and search pages? That's a violation! There are many more.

2. It is not the case that they automatically bar you when they detect some malicious clicking. They hold back the clicks for some more checking. Some, like EFV, have passed that checking so it's possible others can too.

3. Forums are trickier than other sites purely because there may be a post encouraging a click .... or users may feel a sense of loyalty that encourages them to click ads to earn you money.

4. When something does go wrong it pays to always be polite. Write to Google, confirm that you have not intentionally violated the TOS, reiterate your commitment to following the TOS and respectfully ask if they can share any information with you. Adding your respect and admiration for the Adsense program is sucking up - but may well work.

5. Never take a confrontational tone. It's a contractual agreement that can be terminated at any time by either party. So, if they want to cease dealing with you they are entitled to and they don't owe you an explanation. However, the retaining of already earned income really does suck. Particularly as nobody knows how much is actually refunded to advertisers - there is no third party audit. Bear in mind that they are hardly likely to terminate your account to improve their bottom line. That's too short termist and not typical behaviour of the canny operator that Google is.

Good luck miguelito . Your numbers don't add up. The 20-30 clicks in 25,000 wouldn't, I suspect, have been the cause. Look deeper.

miguelito

2:08 pm on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



thanks, that all makes perfect sense to me. I can confirm that i havenīt violated anything in the TOS
- no "please click" posts
- no google search bar
- ads in standard format
- no other advertisers used

but i think you are right about forum sites, it is quite possible that some of the members (not guests) have begun to feel a sense of loyalty and clicked on the ads thinking they were helping.

As for treating with google, i can only say i was politeness and formality itself, emphasising i was shocked they had found invalid clicks but did not dispute it for one moment and was willing to do anything necessary to prevent it happening again and if they could only direct me as to what the problem was I would work with them immediately to find a solution including banning any IPs which were guilty of the practice.

I still got the door slammed in my face with a "we canīt discuss how we detect these clicks" standard reply letter.

miguelito

2:10 pm on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



one more point about the original question, the difference between disabled and terminated....there is no difference, itīs just google legal talk as terminated sounds a little strong for them.
for "disabled" read "crippled" or "scr**ed"

oddsod

2:30 pm on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"we canīt discuss how we detect these clicks"

You are right. So, you got an automated reply. Now, you want to get the attention of someone enough for them to take the trouble to reply manually.

What type of emails are they most likely to get on a termination? Don't give them that, give them something different. Most letters are going to pick up on the "invalid click" terminology and try to address that. Be different. In fact, state in your email what they are likely to state anyway (including the fact you appreciate they cannot disclose methods used). And, one possible approach is the I'd really like to come back, I would be grateful for any advice on how I can make my site compliant.

It could be that they don't really want your kind of forum in the network. If all else fails, move on, forget about them. Live with the alternatives and you may do even better in the long run.

svcglobal

2:32 pm on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I don't think so, miguelito. Those people use lawyer's terms precisely, terminated is terminated and disabled "should" be disabled, I guess.
But I didn't receive that "second stage" email yet, maybe they will explain better the decision.
BTW, those points discussed above were also not applicable in my site, no forums, no "click here", etc.

momotan

3:38 pm on Mar 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Why is every "i got the boot" thread the same. A new user, with broken english, claims they did nothing wrong but got axed.

I am not saying it's not true, I am just saying 99% of the threads are the same.

This 46 message thread spans 2 pages: 46