Forum Moderators: martinibuster
We are running a website and have done 3.3 million google adsense impressions but have only managed to to generate about 2000 clicks. I think this is extremely poor what do you say? Are there any best practices that we should follow? Please let me know if you feel that there are some best practices for Google Adsense.
Thanks a lot for your help
1. Visitors stay on our site for extremely long periods of time.
2. There are lot of repeat visitors.
3. Till now, at most there have been 10 different google ads on the site.
The google ads are all in line with the context.
What can I do to improve?
Thanks a lot for your help
What I would do is put some affiliate ads up that pay better.
The better your site is the worse AS will do. The more worthless the site the better AS will do.
Ouch! That hurts. I can't agree that my >5% CTR on one of my sites mean that I am getting a high CTR because the site is crap.
It may mean that the visitors the site is attracting are actually looking for something -- so I provide content while the ads provide the resources my audience needs. Perfect fit!
flea markets in anderson, south carolina
John's Tent sale
2112 albatross lane
anderson, sc 45555
flea markets in florence, south carolina
Flea mall usa
2334 singer st
...you get the picture. here you have many repetitions of the keywords, flea market, but the purpose is, allegedly, a directory. now, let's say you don't have anyone in the directory yet, because you have only just started it. then it just looks like:
flea markets in bridgeton, massachusetts
flea marktets in darden, massacusetts
flea markets in efflington, massachusetts
flea markets in fordlane, massachusetts
yadda yadda.
this wouldn't be something they would object to, would they? i mean this is how it would look until you actually got people signed up in the directory (assuming you charged admission)
And to think it started off with a title of "Google Adsense best practices".
That's a deceptive title anyway (even if it may have been unintentionally so at the time).
Any chance of a mod now changing the title to: "Worst spammy practices that still get you paid without getting you thrown out"?
<sigh>
Afterall, in message #3 of this forum [webmasterworld.com...] the poster was already saying they are already in mid-6 figures as of July and are on target to break 7 figures. With the techniques this poster is advocating in this forum, I can only draw one conclusion: spam works.
the only issue seems to be repetition of the keywords flea and market. but that's what the page is about. flea market listings. as long as the keyword density isn't ridiculous, what's the problem. And...with more listings of flea markets added to the page over time, the density for those keywords actually goes down.
I don't see the problem. And I don't think it is spamming. Spamming would be simple repetition of the keyword many times FOR NO APPARENT PURPOSE.
I got hold of this person's website and saw it was a financial directory -- created in a way that ownerrim wanted. It looked sophisticated with first class web design. Call it a directory, or call it a scraper site, but apparently G is now taking a second look at these sites and judging some, if not all of them to be unsuitable for Adsense.
When you create a directory site, be sure that there is content OTHER than the directory. Just to be on the safe side.
How many pages have Adsense on them that generated the 3M+ impressions?
====
This site is a sports website.
It does have a forum though its not really used so often.
Almost all the pages have adsense, however 90% of the impression are generated by one page only.
I have a similar problem, also on a sports website: most impressions are on 2 pages and they have almost 0 click throughs. The other pages are doing fine. Try to fix it by putting AS somewhere in the text and try to lead your customers to other pages within your site. Now that you can have multipel ad units you could try one near the top, one halfway and one near the bottom.
And I agree with ogletree: the best pages perform the worst, especially if they have outgoing links like the 2 I mention.
But, somehow, there has to be a balance between profitability and quality. I suspect that ogletree's "worst" pages are still pretty decent, by objective standards.
Even if your site is a beta under development with best intentions to fill out the content "eventually" .. the sufer is king to the responsible SEs .. (rightfully so)
Never mind why I might have insight into this (sigh)