Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52
Don't know if they still test these as an initial dupe sniff test, but I'd stay away from them if at all possible. Best practice a few years ago was that it was better to do without a description rather than have dupes.
For example on user generated pages like forum posts I just use the sites primary meta description since the user is not asked to enter one when they create a forum topic.
Any suggestions for testing new meta descriptions?
Change a few and track those more closely?
Is it even worth testing a slightly different meta with more call-to-action in it?
B Webmaster tools specifically flag a "missing description" and "description too long or too short" as "HIGH severity" SEO blunders under their SEO report. Since a lot of other factors appear similar to G's and G doesn't specify one way or the other, beware.
Yes, I counted.