Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
[edited by: Sgt_Kickaxe at 3:27 pm (utc) on Oct 5, 2011]
seoholic wrote:
My point is, that this is a completely irrelevant search result and google.it still ranks wikipedia.it for high volume search terms e.g. "Berlusconi".
Sgt_Kickaxe wrote:
I don't watch the Italian serps but this sounds like a warning shot from Wikipedia to google.
[edited by: rlange at 3:38 pm (utc) on Oct 5, 2011]
rischiano di essere fortemente compromessi dal comma 29 del cosiddetto DDL intercettazioni.
[edited by: Leosghost at 3:48 pm (utc) on Oct 5, 2011]
This proposal, which the Italian Parliament is currently debating, provides, among other things, a requirement to all websites to publish, within 48 hours of the request and without any comment, a correction of any content that the applicant deems detrimental to his/her image.
Unfortunately, the law does not require an evaluation of the claim by an impartial third judge - the opinion of the person allegedly injured is all that is required, in order to impose such correction to any website.
I wrote:
Understandable. This all just happened today (or yesterday), apparently.